Huntington National Bank 2009 Annual Report Download - page 114

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 114 of the 2009 Huntington National Bank annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 220

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
  • 165
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • 171
  • 172
  • 173
  • 174
  • 175
  • 176
  • 177
  • 178
  • 179
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • 195
  • 196
  • 197
  • 198
  • 199
  • 200
  • 201
  • 202
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208
  • 209
  • 210
  • 211
  • 212
  • 213
  • 214
  • 215
  • 216
  • 217
  • 218
  • 219
  • 220

capital are char
g
ed (credited) with a four-
y
ear movin
g
avera
g
e FTP rate. The intent of the FTP methodolo
gy
is to eliminate all interest rate risk from the business se
g
ments b
y
providin
g
matched duration fundin
g
o
f
assets and liabilities. The result is to centralize the financial impact, mana
g
ement, and reportin
g
of interest rat
e
and liquidit
y
risk in the Treasur
y
/Other function where it can be monitored and mana
g
ed. The denominator in
net
i
nterest mar
gi
nca
l
cu
l
at
i
on
h
as
b
een mo
difi
e
d
to a
dd
t
h
e amount o
f
net
f
un
d
s prov
id
e
dby
eac
hb
us
i
ness
se
g
ment
f
or a
ll
per
i
o
d
s presente
d.
In 2009, a compre
h
ens
i
ve rev
i
ew o
f
our FTP met
h
o
d
o
l
o
gy
resu
l
te
di
nc
h
an
g
es to var
i
ous assumpt
i
ons
,
includin
g
liquidit
y
premiums. FTP rates char
g
ed to business se
g
ments holdin
g
commercial loans, and credite
d
to se
g
ments holdin
g
indeterminate maturit
y
and time deposits, were impacted most. Business se
g
ment financia
l
per
f
ormance
f
or 2009 re
fl
ect t
h
e met
h
o
d
o
l
o
gy
c
h
an
g
es,
h
owever,
fi
nanc
i
a
l
per
f
ormance
f
or 2008 was no
t
restate
d
to re
fl
ect t
h
ese c
h
an
g
es as t
h
ec
h
an
g
es
f
or t
h
at
y
ear were not mater
i
a
l
.T
h
e
i
mpact o
f
t
his
methodolo
gy
chan
g
e to 2009 financial performance was a $291.1 million increase in the net interest mar
g
i
n
f
or Treasury/Ot
h
er compare
d
w
i
t
h
resu
l
ts un
d
er t
h
e prev
i
ous met
h
o
d
o
l
ogy, an
d
an aggregate
d
ecrease to t
h
e
net
i
nterest mar
gi
no
f
t
h
eot
h
er
fi
ve
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments
by
t
h
e same amount. As a resu
l
to
f
t
hi
sc
h
an
g
e,
business se
g
ment performance for net interest income comparisons between 2009 and 2008 are affected.
F
ee S
h
arin
g
Our business se
g
ments operate in cooperation to provide products and services to our customers. Revenue
i
s recor
d
e
di
nt
h
e
b
us
i
ness se
g
ment respons
ibl
e
f
or t
h
ere
l
ate
d
pro
d
uct or serv
i
ce. Fee s
h
ar
i
n
gi
s recor
d
e
d
to
a
ll
ocate port
i
ons o
f
suc
h
revenue to ot
h
er
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments
i
nvo
l
ve
di
nse
lli
n
g
to or prov
idi
n
g
serv
i
ce t
o
customers. The most si
g
nificant revenues for which fee sharin
g
is recorded relate to customer derivatives and
b
ro
k
era
g
e serv
i
ces, w
hi
c
h
are recor
d
e
dby
PFG an
d
s
h
are
d
pr
i
mar
ily
w
i
t
h
Reta
il
an
d
Bus
i
ness Ban
ki
n
g
an
d
Commerc
i
a
l
Ban
ki
n
g
. Resu
l
ts o
f
operat
i
ons
f
or t
h
e
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments re
fl
ect t
h
ese
f
ee s
h
ar
i
n
g
a
ll
ocat
i
ons.
E
x
p
ense Allocation
Business se
g
ment results are determined based upon our mana
g
ement reportin
g
s
y
stem, which assi
g
n
s
b
a
l
ance s
h
eet an
di
ncome statement
i
tems to eac
h
o
f
t
h
e
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments. T
h
e process
i
s
d
es
ig
ne
d
aroun
d
our or
g
an
i
zat
i
ona
l
an
d
mana
g
ement structure an
d
, accor
di
n
gly
,t
h
e resu
l
ts
d
er
i
ve
d
are not necessar
ily
comparable with similar information published b
y
other financial institutions
.
The mana
g
ement accountin
g
process used to develop the business se
g
ment reportin
g
utilized variou
s
estimates and allocation methodolo
g
ies to measure the performance of the business se
g
ments. Expenses ar
e
a
ll
ocate
d
to
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments us
i
n
g
a two-p
h
ase approac
h
.T
h
e
fi
rst p
h
ase cons
i
sts o
f
measur
i
n
g
an
d
ass
ig
n
i
n
g
un
i
t costs (act
i
v
i
t
y
-
b
ase
d
costs) to act
i
v
i
t
i
es
i
nc
id
ent to pro
d
uct or
igi
nat
i
on an
d
serv
i
c
i
n
g
.T
h
es
e
activit
y
-based costs are then extended, based on volumes, with the resultin
g
amount allocated to busines
s
se
g
ments which own the related products. The second phase consists of the allocation of overhead costs to all
fi
ve
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments
f
rom Treasur
y
/Ot
h
er. Dur
i
n
g
2009, we
i
mp
l
emente
d
a
f
u
ll
-a
ll
ocat
i
on met
h
o
d
o
l
o
gy,
where all Treasur
y
/Other expenses, except those related to servicin
g
Franklin assets, reported “Si
g
nifican
t
Items” (excludin
g
the
g
oodwill impairment), and a small residual of other unallocated expenses, are allocate
d
to t
h
eot
h
er
fi
ve
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments. Pr
i
or to t
hi
s
i
mp
l
ementat
i
on, on
ly
certa
i
n expenses were a
ll
ocate
d
to t
he
fi
ve
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments. Bus
i
ness se
g
ment
fi
nanc
i
a
l
per
f
ormance
f
or 2009 re
fl
ect t
h
e
i
mp
l
ementat
i
on,
h
owever
,
fi
nanc
i
a
l
per
f
ormance
f
or 2008 was not restate
dd
ue to
i
mpract
i
ca
bili
t
y
. As a resu
l
to
f
t
hi
sc
h
an
g
e,
b
us
i
nes
s
se
g
ment performance comparisons for noninterest expense between 2009 and 2008 are affected
.
Treasur
y
/Ot
h
er
T
h
e Treasur
y
/Ot
h
er
f
unct
i
on
i
nc
l
u
d
es revenue an
d
expense re
l
ate
d
to assets,
li
a
bili
t
i
es, an
d
equ
i
t
y
no
t
di
rect
ly
ass
ig
ne
d
or a
ll
ocate
d
to one o
f
t
h
e
fi
ve
b
us
i
ness se
g
ments. Assets
i
nc
l
u
d
e
i
nvestment secur
i
t
i
es,
b
an
k
owned life insurance, and the loans and OREO properties acquired throu
g
h the 2009 first quarter Franklin
restructur
i
n
g
.T
h
e
fi
nanc
i
a
li
mpact assoc
i
ate
d
w
i
t
h
our FTP met
h
o
d
o
l
o
gy
,as
d
escr
ib
e
d
a
b
ove,
i
sa
l
so
i
nc
l
u
d
e
d.
Net
i
nterest
i
ncome
i
nc
l
u
d
es t
h
e
i
mpact o
f
a
d
m
i
n
i
ster
i
n
g
our
i
nvestment secur
i
t
i
es port
f
o
li
os an
d
t
h
ene
t
i
mpact o
fd
er
i
vat
i
ves use
d
to
h
e
dg
e
i
nterest rate sens
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
. Non
i
nterest
i
ncome
i
nc
l
u
d
es m
i
sce
ll
aneous
f
ee
106