CenterPoint Energy 2015 Annual Report Download - page 36
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 36 of the 2015 CenterPoint Energy annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.process.Somestateshaveadopted,andotherstatesareconsideringadopting,legalrequirementsthatcouldimposemorestringentpermitting,publicdisclosureor
well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing activities. Local government also may seek to adopt ordinances within their jurisdictions regulating the
time,placeandmannerofdrillingactivitiesingeneralorhydraulicfracturingactivitiesinparticular,insomecasesbanninghydraulicfracturingentirely.Other
governmental agencies, including the DOE and the EPA, have evaluated or are evaluating various other aspects of hydraulic fracturing such as the potential
environmentaleffectsofhydraulicfracturingondrinkingwaterandgroundwater.
Ifnewormorestringentfederal,stateorlocallegalrestrictionsrelatingtothehydraulicfracturingprocessareadoptedinareaswhereEnable’soilandnatural
gasexplorationandproduction customers operate, theycould incur potentially significant added costs to comply with such requirements, experience delays or
curtailmentinthepursuitofexploration,development,orproductionactivities,andperhapsevenbeprecludedfromdrillingwells,someorallofwhichactivities
couldadverselyaffectdemandforEnable’sservicestothosecustomers.
Enable’s operations are subject to extensive regulation by federal, state and local regulatory authorities. Changes or additional regulatory measures adopted
by such authorities could have a material adverse effect on Enable’s results of operations and ability to make cash distributions.
TherateschargedbyseveralofEnable’spipelinesystems,includingforinterstategastransportationserviceprovidedbyitsintrastatepipelines,areregulated
bythe FERC. Enable’s pipelineoperationsthatarenot regulated by theFERCmay be subject tostateand local regulation applicable to intrastate naturaland
transportationservices.TherelevantstatesinwhichEnableoperatesincludeNorthDakota,Oklahoma,Arkansas,Louisiana,Texas,Missouri,Kansas,Mississippi,
TennesseeandIllinois.
TheFERCandstateregulatoryagenciesalsoregulateothertermsandconditionsoftheservicesEnablemayoffer.Ifoneoftheseregulatoryagencies,onits
owninitiative ordueto challengesbythird parties,wereto lowerits tariff ratesordenyanyrate increase orother material changestothe types,or termsand
conditions,ofserviceEnablemightproposeoroffer,theprofitabilityofEnable’spipelinebusinessescouldsuffer.IfEnablewerepermittedtoraiseitstariffrates
foraparticularpipeline,theremightbesignificantdelaybetweenthetimethetariffrateincreaseisapprovedandthetimethattherateincreaseactuallygoesinto
effect, which could also limit its profitability. Furthermore, competition from other pipeline systems may prevent Enable from raising its tariff rates even if
regulatory agencies permit it to do so. The regulatory agencies that regulate Enable’s systems periodically implement new rules, regulations and terms and
conditionsofservicessubjecttotheirjurisdiction.NewinitiativesorordersmayadverselyaffecttherateschargedforEnable’sservicesorotherwiseadversely
affectitsfinancialcondition,resultsofoperationsandcashflowsanditsabilitytomakecashdistributions.
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of Enable’s assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a change in policy by those
agencies may result in increased regulation of its assets, which may cause its revenues to decline and operating expenses to increase.
Enable’s natural gas gathering and intrastate transportation operations are generally exempt from the jurisdiction of the FERC under the NGA, but FERC
regulationmayindirectlyimpactthesebusinessesandthemarketsforproductsderivedfromthesebusinesses.TheFERC’spoliciesandpracticesacrosstherange
ofitsoilandnaturalgasregulatoryactivities,including,forexample,itspoliciesoninterstateopenaccesstransportation,ratemaking,capacityrelease,andmarket
center promotion may indirectly affect intrastate markets.In recent years, the FERChas pursued pro-competitive policies in itsregulation of interstate oil and
naturalgaspipelines.However,wecannotassureyouthattheFERCwillcontinuetopursuethisapproachasitconsidersmatterssuchaspipelineratesandrules
andpoliciesthatmayindirectlyaffecttheintrastatenaturalgastransportationbusiness.AlthoughtheFERChasnotmadeaformaldeterminationwithrespecttoall
ofEnable’sfacilitiesitconsiderstobegatheringfacilities,EnablebelievesthatitsnaturalgasgatheringpipelinesmeetthetraditionalteststhattheFERChasused
to determine that a pipeline is a gathering pipeline and are therefore not subject to FERC jurisdiction. The distinction between FERC-regulated transmission
services and federally unregulated gathering services, however, has been the subject of substantial litigation, and the FERC determines whether facilities are
gatheringfacilitiesonacase-by-casebasis,sotheclassificationandregulationofEnable’sgatheringfacilitiesissubjecttochangebasedonfuturedeterminations
bytheFERC,thecourtsorCongress.IftheFERCweretoconsiderthestatusofanindividualfacilityanddeterminethatthefacilityand/orservicesprovidedbyit
arenotexemptfromFERCregulationundertheNGAandthatthefacilityprovidesinterstateservice,theratesfor,andtermsandconditionsof,servicesprovided
bysuchfacilitywouldbesubjecttoregulationbytheFERCundertheNGAortheNGPA.Suchregulationcoulddecreaserevenue,increaseoperatingcosts,and,
depending upon the facility in question, could adversely affect Enable’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and its ability to make cash
distributions.Inaddition,ifanyofEnable’sfacilitieswerefoundtohaveprovidedservicesorotherwiseoperatedinviolationoftheNGAortheNGPA,thiscould
resultintheimposition ofsubstantialcivil penalties,as wellasarequirementto disgorgerevenuescollected forsuch servicesinexcessofthemaximumrates
establishedbytheFERC.
32