Berkshire Hathaway 2001 Annual Report Download - page 17

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 17 of the 2001 Berkshire Hathaway annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 74

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74

16
There is a spread of about two percentage points between what Berkadia pays on its borrowing and what it
receives from FINOVA, with this spread flowing 90% to Berkshire and 10% to Leucadia. As I write this, each loan
has been paid down to $3.9 billion.
As part of the bankruptcy plan, which was approved on August 10, 2001, Berkshire also agreed to offer
70% of face value for up to $500 million principal amount of the $3.25 billion of new 7½% bonds that were issued
by FINOVA. (Of these, we had already received $426.8 million in principal amount because of our 13% ownership
of the original debt.) Our offer, which was to run until September 26, 2001, could be withdrawn under a variety of
conditions, one of which became operative if the New York Stock Exchange closed during the offering period.
When that indeed occurred in the week of September 11th, we promptly terminated the offer.
Many of FINOVAs loans involve aircraft assets whose values were significantly diminished by the events
of September 11th. Other receivables held by the company also were imperiled by the economic consequences of
the attack that day. FINOVAs prospects, therefore, are not as good as when we made our proposal to the
bankruptcy court. Nevertheless we feel that overall the transaction will prove satisfactory for Berkshire. Leucadia
has day-to-day operating responsibility for FINOVA, and we have long been impressed with the business acumen
and managerial talent of its key executives.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Its déjà vu time again: In early 1965, when the investment partnership I ran took control of Berkshire, that
company had its main banking relationships with First National Bank of Boston and a large New York City bank.
Previously, I had done no business with either.
Fast forward to 1969, when I wanted Berkshire to buy the Illinois National Bank and Trust of Rockford.
We needed $10 million, and I contacted both banks. There was no response from New York. However, two
representatives of the Boston bank immediately came to Omaha. They told me they would supply the money for
our purchase and that we would work out the details later.
For the next three decades, we borrowed almost nothing from banks. (Debt is a four-letter word around
Berkshire.) Then, in February, when we were structuring the FINOVA transaction, I again called Boston, where
First National had morphed into FleetBoston. Chad Gifford, the companys president, responded just as Bill Brown
and Ira Stepanian had back in 1969  youve got the money and well work out the details later.
And thats just what happened. FleetBoston syndicated a loan for $6 billion (as it turned out, we didnt
need $400 million of it), and it was quickly oversubscribed by 17 banks throughout the world. Sooooo . . . if you
ever need $6 billion, just give Chad a call  assuming, that is, your credit is AAA.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
One more point about our investments: The media often report that Buffett is buying this or that security,
having picked up the fact from reports that Berkshire files. These accounts are sometimes correct, but at other
times the transactions Berkshire reports are actually being made by Lou Simpson, who runs a $2 billion portfolio for
GEICO that is quite independent of me. Normally, Lou does not tell me what he is buying or selling, and I learn of
his activities only when I look at a GEICO portfolio summary that I receive a few days after the end of each month.
Lous thinking, of course, is quite similar to mine, but we usually end up in different securities. Thats largely
because hes working with less money and can therefore invest in smaller companies than I. Oh, yes, theres also
another minor difference between us: In recent years, Lous performance has been far better than mine.