Unilever 2014 Annual Report Download - page 39

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 39 of the 2014 Unilever annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 105

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105

SIXYEAR HISTORIAL TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN
(TSR) PERFORMANE
The table below ncludes
growth n the value of a hypothetcal £100 holdng over sx
years’ FTSE 100 comparson based on 30-tradng-day average
values and
growth n the value of a hypothetcal 100 nvestment over sx
years’ AEX comparson based on 30-tradng-day average values
The ommttee has decded to show Unlever’s performance
aganst the FTSE 100 Index, London and also the Euronext 100
ndex (AEX), Amsterdam as these are the most relevant ndces n
the UK and the Netherlands where we have our prncpal lstngs
Unlever s a consttuent of both these ndces
Unilever NVUnilever PLC FTSE 100 AEX
Value of hypothetical £/holding
Dec 2008
Dec 2009
Dec 2010Dec 2011Dec 2012Dec 2013Dec 2014
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
EO SINLE FIURE SIXYEAR HISTORY
The table below shows the sx-year hstory of the EO sngle
fgure of total remuneraton
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
EO
Sngle fgure of total
remuneraton ( ‘000) 3,859 6,292 6,010 7,852 7,740 9,561
Annual bonus award
rates aganst maxmum
opportunty 82% 80% 68% 100% 78% 66%
SIP performance
shares vestng rates
aganst maxmum
opportunty n/a 47% 44% 55% 64% 61%
MIP performance
shares vestng rates
aganst maxmum
opportunty n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 81%
Share Matchng Plan
vestng rates aganst
maxmum opportunty*100% 100% n/a n/a n/a n/a
* Shown n year of award
PERENTAE HANE IN REMUNERATION OF DIRETOR
UNDERTAKIN THE ROLE OF HIEF EXEUTIVE OFFIER
The table below shows the percentage change from 2013 to 2014
for base salary, bonus and benefts (excludng penson) for both
Paul Polman and all UK and Dutch management n Unlever
The subset of UK and Dutch management has been used as a
far representaton of our dual lstng status
% change from 2013 to 2014 Salary Bonus
Benefts
(not ncludng
penson)
EO(a) (b) 52% -114% 124%
UK and Dutch management (c) 34% 67% -80%
(a) alculated usng the data from the Executve Drectors sngle fgure table
on page 67
(b) The EO’s ncrease of salary of 52% as reflected n the table s due to
movements n the presentatonal currency, rather than a change n base
salary whch was £1,010,000 n both 2013 and 2014 Movements n the
presentatonal currency also had a smlar mpact on benefts and bonus
(c) Whle the table shows that the average base salary costs for all employees
ncreased by 34%, ths s drven by a proportonately larger ncrease n the
total headcount durng the year The average ncrease was approxmately
62% f the 2013 UK and Dutch management populaton reman constant
The same apples for both benefts and bonus numbers where, on a
constant bass, the average beneft provson ncreased by approxmately
228% rather than decreased by 8% and the bonuses ncreased by 218%
rather than 67%
RELATIVE IMPORTANE OF SPEND ON PAY
The chart below shows the relatve spend on pay compared
wth dvdends pad to Unlever shareholders and core earnngs
ore earnngs represent the net proft attrbutable to Unlever
shareholders, adusted for non-core tems Over tme, both core
earnngs and core earnngs growth provde a good reference pont
to compare spend on pay
RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF SPEND ON PAY
Core earnings(1)Dividends paid to
Unilever shareholders
Total staff costs
0.6%
7.2%
-2.3%
2013 2014
€0m
€1,000m
€2,000m
€3,000m
€4,000m
€5,000m
€6,000m
€7,000m
(1) In calculating core earnings, net profit attributable to shareholders’
equity is adjusted to eliminate the post-tax impact of non-core items.
Refer to note 7, and the table entitled calculation of core earnings on
page 102 for reconciliation of core earnings to net profit attributable
to shareholders' equity.
THE OMPENSATION OMMITTEE
Durng 2014, the ommttee comprsed four Non-Executve
Drectors Paul Walsh (ommttee harman), Mchael Treschow,
Ann Fudge and Kees Storm
The ommttee revewed ts terms of reference durng the year
The ommttee’s revsed terms of reference are contaned wthn
The overnance of Unlever’, and are also set out on our webste
wwwunlevercom/corporategovernance
76 Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2014Governance
DIRETORS’ REMUNERATION
REPORT ONTINUED