Citrix 2005 Annual Report Download - page 61
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 61 of the 2005 Citrix annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.Page59
$355.7million.TheCompanyusedtheproceedsfromitsheld-to-maturityinvestmentsthatmaturedonMarch22,2004andcash
on hand to fund the redemption. At the date of redemption,the Company incurred a charge for the write-off of the remaining
deferreddebtissuancecostsofapproximately$7.2million.
9.FAIRVALUESOFFINANCIALINSTRUMENTS
Thecarryingvalueofcashandcashequivalents,accountsreceivable,accountspayableandaccruedexpensesapproximatetheir
fairvalueduetotheshortmaturityoftheseitems.TheCompany’sinvestmentsclassifiedasavailable-for-salesecurities,including
restrictedinvestments,arecarriedatfairvalueontheaccompanyingconsolidatedbalancesheetsbasedprimarilyonquotedmarket
pricesforsuchfinancialinstruments.TheCompany’sTermLoancarryingvalueapproximatesfairvalueduetoitsmarketrateof
interest.TheaggregatefairvalueoftheCompany’savailable-for-saleinvestmentswas$76.9millionand$479.6millionatDecember31,
2005and2004,respectively.
10.COMMITMENTSANDCONTINGENCIES
TheCompanyleasescertainofficespaceandequipmentundervariousoperatingleases.Inadditiontorent,theleasesrequirethe
Companytopayfortaxes,insurance,maintenanceandotheroperatingexpenses.Certainoftheseleasescontainstatedescalation
clauseswhileotherscontainrenewaloptions.TheCompanyrecognizesrentexpenseonastraight-linebasisoverthetermofthe
lease,excludingrenewalperiods,unlessrenewaloftheleaseisreasonablyassured.
RentalexpensefortheyearsendedDecember31,2005,2004and2003totaledapproximately$21.2million,$18.0millionand
$16.4million,respectively.SubleaseincomefortheyearsendedDecember31,2005,2004and2003wasapproximately$0.8million,
$1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases with initial or remaining
termsinexcessofoneyearandsubleaseincomeassociatedwithnon-cancelablesubleases,includingestimatedfuturepayments
undertheCompany’ssyntheticleasearrangement,areasfollows:
(Inthousands) OperatingLeases SubleaseIncome
YearsendingDecember31,
2006 $22,702 $1,236
2007 17,142 1,267
2008 12,935 1,299
2009 9,027 1,319
2010 4,462 585
Thereafter 25,819 561
$92,087 $6,267
During2002,theCompanybecameapartytoasyntheticleasearrangementtotalingapproximately$61.0millionforitscorporate
headquartersofficespaceinFortLauderdale,Florida.Thesyntheticleaserepresentsaformofoff-balancesheetfinancingunder
whichanunrelatedthirdpartylessorfunded100%ofthecostsofacquiringthepropertyandleasestheassettotheCompany.
The synthetic lease qualifies as an operating lease for accounting purposes and as a financing lease for tax purposes. The
Company does not include the property or the related lease debt as an asset or a liability in its consolidated balance sheets.
Consequently,paymentsmadepursuanttotheleasearerecordedasoperatingexpensesintheCompany’sconsolidatedstatements
ofincome.TheCompanyenteredintothesyntheticleaseinordertoleaseitsheadquarterspropertiesundermorefavorableterms
thanunderitspreviousleasearrangements.
Theinitialtermofthesyntheticleaseissevenyears.Uponapprovalbythelessor,theCompanycanrenewtheleasetwiceforadditional
two-yearperiods.TheleasepaymentsvarybasedonLIBORplusamargin.Atanytimeduringtheleaseterm,theCompanyhasthe
optiontosubleasethepropertyanduponthirty-days’writtennotice,theCompanyhastheoptiontopurchasethepropertyforan
amountrepresentingtheoriginalpropertycostandtransactionfeesofapproximately$61.0millionplusanyleasebreakagecostsand
outstandingamountsowed.Uponatleast180daysnoticepriortotheterminationoftheinitialleaseterm,theCompanyhastheoption
toremarketthepropertyforsaletoathirdparty.IftheCompanychoosesnottopurchasethepropertyattheendoftheleaseterm,
ithasguaranteedaresidualvaluetothelessorofapproximately$51.9millionandpossessionofthebuildingswillbereturnedto
thelessor.Onaperiodicbasis,theCompanyevaluatesthepropertyforindicatorsofimpairment.Ifanevaluationweretoindicate
thatfairvalueofthebuildingweretodeclinebelow$51.9million,theCompanywouldberesponsibleforthedifferenceunderits
residualvalueguarantee,whichcouldhaveamaterialadverseeffectontheCompany’sresultsofoperationsandfinancialcondition.