El Pollo Loco 2016 Annual Report Download - page 80
Download and view the complete annual report
Please find page 80 of the 2016 El Pollo Loco annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.![](/annual_reports_html/ElPolloLoco-2016-Annual-Report-220d629/bg_80.png)
EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Belowareourbasicanddilutednetincome(loss)persharedatafortheperiodsindicated,whichareinthousandsexceptforpersharedata.
For the Years Ended
December 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
December 25,
2013
Numerator:
Netincome(loss) $ 24,054 $ 42,463 $ (16,873)
Denominator:
Weighted-averagesharesoutstanding—Basic 37,949,316 32,285,484 28,712,622
Weighted-averagesharesoutstanding—Diluted 39,039,558 34,346,241 28,712,622
Netincome(loss)pershare—Basic $ 0.63 $ 1.32 $ (0.59)
Netincome(loss)pershare—Diluted $ 0.62 $ 1.24 $ (0.59)
Anti-dilutivesecuritiesnotconsideredindilutedEPS
calculation 214,411 5,865 1,709,748
FortheyearendedDecember25,2013,potentiallydilutivesecurities,whichconsistofoptionstopurchase1,709,748sharesofcommonstockatpricesranging
from$1.81to$12.72werenotincludedinthecomputationofdilutednetlosspersharebecausesuchinclusionwouldbeantidilutive.
Belowisareconciliationofbasicanddilutedsharecounts.
For the Years Ended
December 30,
2015
December 31,
2014
December 25,
2013
Weighted-averagesharesoutstanding—Basic 37,949,316 32,285,484 28,712,622
Dilutiveeffectofstockoptionsandrestrictedshares 1,090,242 2,060,757 —
Weighted-averagesharesoutstanding—Diluted 39,039,558 34,346,241 28,712,622
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
OnoraboutFebruary24,2014,aformeremployeefiledaclassactionintheSuperiorCourtoftheStateofCalifornia,CountyofOrange,againstEPLonbehalfof
allputativeclassmembers(allhourlyemployeesfrom2010tothepresent)allegingcertainviolationsofCalifornialaborlaws,includingfailuretopayovertime
compensation,failuretoprovidemealperiodsandrestbreaks,andfailuretoprovideitemizedwagestatements.Theputativeleadplaintiff’srequestedremedies
includecompensatoryandpunitivedamages,injunctiverelief,disgorgementofprofits,andreasonableattorneys’feesandcosts.Nospecificamountofdamages
soughtwasspecifiedinthecomplaint.WehaveexecutedaMemorandumofUnderstandingoutlininganagreementinprinciplebetweenthepartiestosettlethe
claimsonaclasswidebasis.Thepartiesareworkingtomemorializethesettlementandsecuretherequiredcourtapproval.
DanielTurocy,etal.v.ElPolloLocoHoldings,Inc.,etal.(CaseNo.8:15-cv-01343)wasfiledintheUnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheCentralDistrictof
CaliforniaonAugust24,2015,andRonHuston,etal.v.ElPolloLocoHoldings,Inc.,etal.(CaseNo.8:15-cv-01710)wasfiledintheUnitedStatesDistrictCourt
fortheCentralDistrictofCaliforniaonOctober22,2015.Thetwolawsuitshavebeenconsolidated,withco-leadplaintiffsandclasscounsel.Aconsolidated
complaintwasfiledonJanuary29,2016onbehalfofco-leadplaintiffsandotherssimilarlysituated,allegingviolationsoffederalsecuritieslawsinconnection
withHoldingscommonstockpurchasedorotherwiseacquiredandthepurchaseofcalloptionsorthesaleofputoptions,betweenMay1,2015andAugust13,
2015(the“ClassPeriod”).ThenameddefendantsareHoldings;StephenJ.Sather,LauranceRoberts,andEdwardJ.Valle(collectively,the“Individual
Defendants”);andTrimaranPolloPartners,L.L.C.,TrimaranCapitalPartners,andFreemanSpogli&Co.(collectively,the“ControllingShareholderDefendants”).
Amongotherthings,Plaintiffsallegethat,in2014andearly2015,HoldingssufferedlossesduetorisinglaborcostsinCaliforniaand,inanattempttomitigatethe
effectsofsuchrisingcosts,removeda$5valueoptionfromourmenu,whichresultedinadecreaseinvalue-consciousstoretraffic.Plaintiffsfurtherallegethat
duringtheClassPeriod,HoldingsandtheIndividualDefendantsmadeaseriesofmateriallyfalseandmisleadingstatementsthatconcealedtheeffectthatthese
factorswerehavingonstoresalesgrowth,resultinginHoldingsstockcontinuingtobetradedatartificiallyinflatedprices.Asaresult,Plaintiffsandothermembers
oftheputativeclassallegedlysuffereddamagesinconnectionwiththeirpurchaseofHoldings’stockduringtheClassPeriod.Inaddition,Plaintiffsallegethatthe
IndividualDefendantsandControllingShareholderDefendantshaddirectinvolvementin,andresponsibilityover,theoperationsofHoldings,andarepresumedto
havehad,amongotherthings,thepowertocontrolorinfluence
77