Sunoco 2008 Annual Report Download - page 61

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 61 of the 2008 Sunoco annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 120

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120

Set forth below are the estimated increases in pension and postretirement benefits expense and benefit
obligations that would occur in 2009 from a change in the indicated assumptions (dollars in millions):
Change
in Rate Expense
Benefit
Obligations*
Pension benefits:
Decrease in the discount rate ........................ .25% $3 $31
Decrease in the long-term expected rate of return
on plan assets .................................. .25% $3 $—
Increase in rate of compensation ..................... .25% $1 $3
Postretirement benefits:
Decrease in the discount rate ........................ .25% $— $8
Increase in the annual health care cost trend rates ...... 1.00% $1 $10
*Represents the projected benefit obligations for defined benefit plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations for
postretirement benefit plans.
Long-Lived Assets
The cost of plants and equipment is generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Useful lives are based on historical experience and are adjusted when changes in planned use,
technological advances or other factors show that a different life would be more appropriate. Changes in useful
lives that do not result in the impairment of an asset are recognized prospectively. There have been no significant
changes in the useful lives of the Company’s plants and equipment during the 2006-2008 period.
A decision to dispose of an asset may necessitate an impairment review. In this situation, an impairment
would be recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset over its fair value less cost
to sell.
Long-lived assets, other than those held for sale, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Such events and
circumstances include, among other factors: operating losses; unused capacity; market value declines;
technological developments resulting in obsolescence; changes in demand for the Company’s products or in
end-use goods manufactured by others utilizing the Company’s products as raw materials; changes in the
Company’s business plans or those of its major customers, suppliers or other business partners; changes in
competition and competitive practices; uncertainties associated with the United States and world economies;
changes in the expected level of capital, operating or environmental remediation expenditures; and changes in
governmental regulations or actions. Additional factors impacting the economic viability of long-lived assets are
described under “Forward-Looking Statements” below.
A long-lived asset that is not held for sale is considered to be impaired when the undiscounted net cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than its carrying amount. Such estimated future cash flows
are highly subjective and are based on numerous assumptions about future operations and market conditions. The
impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the impaired
asset. It is also difficult to precisely estimate fair market value because quoted market prices for the Company’s
long-lived assets may not be readily available. Therefore, fair market value is generally based on the present
values of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks associated with the assets
being reviewed for impairment.
Sunoco had asset impairments totaling $155 and $8 million after tax during 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The impairments in 2008 related to the Tulsa refinery, which the Company intends to sell or convert to a terminal
by the end of 2009; a polypropylene plant in Bayport, TX which the Company intends to permanently shut down
no later than April 30, 2009; goodwill related to the Company’s polypropylene business; and certain retail
53