Nutrisystem 2006 Annual Report Download - page 39

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 39 of the 2006 Nutrisystem annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 76

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76

REP
O
RT
O
F INDEPENDENT RE
G
I
S
TERED P
U
BLI
C
A
CCOU
NTIN
G
FIR
M
Th
e Boar
d
o
f
D
i
rectors an
d
Stoc
kh
o
ld
ers Nutr
i
System, Inc.
:
We have audited mana
g
ement’s assessment, included in the accompan
y
in
g
Mana
g
ement’s Report on Internal
C
ontro
l
over F
i
nanc
i
a
l
Report
i
n
g
,
t
h
at Nutr
i
System, Inc. ma
i
nta
i
ne
d
e
ff
ect
i
ve
i
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
reportin
g
as of December 31, 200
6
, based on criteria established in
I
nterna
l
Contro
l
—Integrate
d
Framewor
k
issued b
y
The Committee o
f
Sponsoring Organizations o
f
the Treadway Commission (COSO)
.
N
utriS
y
stem,
I
nc.’s management
i
s respons
ibl
e
f
or ma
i
nta
i
n
i
ng e
ff
ect
i
ve
i
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
ng an
df
or
i
t
s
a
ssessment o
f
t
h
ee
ff
ect
i
veness o
fi
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
n
g
. Our respons
ibili
t
yi
s to express an
o
pinion on mana
g
ement’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Compan
y
’s internal control ove
r
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
ng
b
ase
d
on our au
di
t.
We con
d
ucte
d
our au
di
t
i
n accor
d
ance w
i
t
h
t
h
e stan
d
ar
d
so
f
t
h
ePu
bli
c Compan
y
Account
i
n
g
Overs
igh
t Boar
d
(United States). Those standards re
q
uire that we
p
lan and
p
erform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
w
h
et
h
er e
ff
ect
i
ve
i
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
ng was ma
i
nta
i
ne
di
na
ll
mater
i
a
l
respects. Our au
di
t
i
nc
l
u
d
e
d
o
b
ta
i
n
i
n
g
an un
d
erstan
di
n
g
o
fi
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
n
g
, eva
l
uat
i
n
g
mana
g
ement’
s
a
ssessment, testin
g
and evaluatin
g
the desi
g
n and operatin
g
effectiveness of internal control, and performin
g
suc
h
o
t
h
er proce
d
ures as we cons
id
ere
d
necessary
i
nt
h
ec
i
rcumstances. We
b
e
li
eve t
h
at our au
di
t prov
id
es a
reasona
bl
e
b
as
i
s
f
or our op
i
n
i
on.
A compan
y
’s internal control over financial reportin
g
is a process desi
g
ned to provide reasonable assuranc
e
regar
di
ng t
h
ere
li
a
bili
ty o
ffi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
ng an
d
t
h
e preparat
i
on o
ffi
nanc
i
a
l
statements
f
or externa
l
purposes
in
a
ccor
d
ance w
i
t
hg
enera
lly
accepte
d
account
i
n
g
pr
i
nc
i
p
l
es. A compan
y
’s
i
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
n
g
includes those
p
olicies and
p
rocedures that (1)
p
ertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail
,
a
ccurate
l
yan
df
a
i
r
l
yre
fl
ect t
h
e transact
i
ons an
ddi
spos
i
t
i
ons o
f
t
h
e assets o
f
t
h
e company; (2) prov
id
e reasona
ble
a
ssurance t
h
at transact
i
ons are recor
d
e
d
as necessar
y
to perm
i
t preparat
i
on o
ffi
nanc
i
a
l
statements
i
n accor
d
ance
with
g
enerall
y
accepted accountin
g
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the compan
y
are bein
g
mad
e
o
n
l
y
i
n accor
d
ance w
i
t
h
aut
h
or
i
zat
i
ons o
f
management an
ddi
rectors o
f
t
h
e company; an
d
(3) prov
id
e reasona
ble
a
ssurance re
g
ar
di
n
g
prevent
i
on or t
i
me
ly d
etect
i
on o
f
unaut
h
or
i
ze
d
acqu
i
s
i
t
i
on, use, or
di
spos
i
t
i
on o
f
t
h
e
compan
y
’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements
.
B
ecause o
fi
ts
i
n
h
erent
li
m
i
tat
i
ons,
i
nterna
l
contro
l
over
fi
nanc
i
a
l
report
i
ng may not prevent or
d
etect
m
i
sstatements. A
l
so, pro
j
ect
i
ons o
f
an
y
eva
l
uat
i
on o
f
e
ff
ect
i
veness to
f
uture per
i
o
d
s are su
bj
ect to t
h
er
i
s
k
t
h
at
controls ma
y
become inadequate because of chan
g
es in conditions, or that the de
g
ree of compliance with th
e
po
li
c
i
es or proce
d
ures may
d
eter
i
orate.
I
n our op
i
n
i
on, mana
g
ement’s assessment t
h
at Nutr
i
S
y
stem, Inc. ma
i
nta
i
ne
d
e
ff
ect
i
ve
i
nterna
l
contro
l
ove
r
f
inancial reportin
g
as of December 31, 2006, is fairl
y
stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established
in
Interna
l
Contro
l
—Inte
g
rate
d
Framewor
k
i
ssue
db
y COS
O
.
A
l
so,
i
n our op
i
n
i
on, Nutr
i
System, Inc.
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reportin
g
as of December 31, 200
6
,
based o
n
c
ri
te
ri
a estab
li
s
h
ed
i
n
I
nternal Control—Inte
g
rated Framework issued b
y
COSO
.
We a
l
so
h
ave au
di
te
d
,
i
n accor
d
ance w
i
t
h
t
h
e stan
d
ar
d
so
f
t
h
ePu
bli
c Company Account
i
ng Overs
i
g
h
t Boar
d
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of NutriS
y
stem, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 200
6
a
nd 200
5
, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equit
y
, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 200
6
, and our report dated February 27, 2007 expressed a
n
u
nqua
lifi
e
d
op
i
n
i
on on t
h
ose conso
lid
ate
dfi
nanc
i
a
l
statement
s
.
/
s/ KPMG LL
P
P
hil
a
d
e
l
p
hi
a, Pennsy
l
van
ia
Fe
b
ruar
y
27, 200
7
33