Nutrisystem 2006 Annual Report Download - page 22

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 22 of the 2006 Nutrisystem annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 76

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76

Congressional hearings about practices in the weight loss industry have also resulted in adverse publicit
y
a
n
d
a consequent
d
ec
li
ne
i
nt
h
e revenue o
f
we
i
g
h
t
l
oss
b
us
i
nesses. Future researc
h
reports or pu
bli
c
i
ty t
h
at are
perceived as unfavorable or that question certain wei
g
ht loss pro
g
rams, products or methods could result in a
d
ecline in our revenue. Because of our dependence on consumer perceptions, adverse publicity associated wit
h
ill
ness or ot
h
er un
d
es
i
ra
bl
ee
ff
ects resu
l
t
i
ng
f
rom t
h
e consumpt
i
on o
f
our pro
d
ucts or s
i
m
il
ar pro
d
ucts
by
competitors, whether or not accurate, could also dama
g
e customer confidence in our wei
g
ht loss pro
g
ram an
d
result in a decline in revenue. Adverse publicity could arise even if the unfavorable effects associated wit
h
we
i
g
h
t
l
oss pro
d
ucts or serv
i
ces resu
l
te
df
rom t
h
e user’s
f
a
il
ure to use suc
h
pro
d
ucts or serv
i
ces appropr
i
ate
l
y
.
O
ur industry is subject to governmental regulation that could increase in severity and hurt results o
f
o
p
erat
i
ons.
O
ur industr
y
is sub
j
ect to federal, state and other
g
overnmental re
g
ulation. For example, some advertisin
g
practices in the weight loss industry have led to investigations from time to time by the FTC and othe
r
g
overnmenta
l
agenc
i
es. Many compan
i
es
i
nt
h
ewe
i
g
h
t
l
oss
i
n
d
ustry,
i
nc
l
u
di
ng our pre
d
ecessor
b
us
i
nesses,
h
ave
entered into consent decrees with the FTC relatin
g
to wei
g
ht loss claims and other advertisin
g
practices. W
e
continue to be subject to these consent decrees, which restrict how we advertise the successes our customers have
a
c
hi
eve
di
n
l
os
i
ng we
i
g
h
tt
h
roug
h
t
h
e program an
d
requ
i
re us to
i
nc
l
u
d
et
h
ep
h
rase “resu
l
ts not typ
i
ca
l
i
n
a
dvertisements. Re
g
ulation of advertisin
g
practices in the wei
g
ht loss industr
y
ma
y
increase in scope or severit
y
in the future, which could have a material adverse im
p
act on our business.
O
ther aspects of our industry are also subject to government regulation. For example, food manufacturer
s
a
re su
bj
ect to r
i
gorous
i
nspect
i
on an
d
ot
h
er requ
i
rements o
f
t
h
e USDA an
d
FDA, an
d
compan
i
es operat
i
ng
in
f
orei
g
n markets must compl
y
with those countries’ requirements for proper labelin
g
, controls on h
yg
iene, food
preparation and other matters. If federal, state, local or foreign regulation of our industry increases for any
reason, t
h
en we may
b
e requ
i
re
d
to
i
ncur s
i
gn
ifi
cant expenses, as we
ll
as mo
dif
y our operat
i
ons to comp
l
yw
i
t
h
new re
g
ulator
y
requirements, which could harm our operatin
g
results. Additionall
y
, remedies available in an
y
potential administrative or regulatory actions may include requiring us to refund amounts paid by all affected
customers or pay ot
h
er
d
amages, w
hi
c
h
cou
ld b
esu
b
stant
i
a
l
.
Changes in consumer preferences and discretionary spending could negatively impact our operating
r
esults.
O
ur pro
g
ram features pre-packa
g
ed food selections, which we believe offer convenience and value to our
customers. Our continued success depends, to a large degree, upon the continued popularity of our program
v
ersus var
i
ous ot
h
er we
i
g
h
t
l
oss, we
i
g
h
t management an
dfi
tness reg
i
mens, suc
h
as
l
ow car
b
o
h
y
d
rate
di
ets
,
a
ppetite suppressants and diets featured in the published media. Chan
g
es in consumer tastes and preference
s
a
way from our pre-packaged food and support and counseling services, and any failure to provide innovative
responses to t
h
ese c
h
anges, may
h
ave a mater
i
a
ll
ya
d
verse
i
mpact on our
b
us
i
ness,
fi
nanc
i
a
l
con
di
t
i
on, operat
i
n
g
results, cash flows and
p
ros
p
ects
.
A
dditionall
y
, the success of our business and our operatin
g
results is dependent on discretionar
y
spendin
g
by consumers. A decline in discretionary spending could adversely affect our business, financial condition,
o
perat
i
ng resu
l
ts an
d
cas
hfl
ows. Our
b
us
i
ness cou
ld
a
l
so
b
ea
d
verse
l
ya
ff
ecte
db
y genera
l
econom
i
c con
di
t
i
ons
,
d
emo
g
raphic trends, consumer confidence in the econom
y
and chan
g
es in disposable consumer income.
The sale o
fi
n
g
ested products
i
nvolves product l
i
ab
i
l
i
ty and other r
i
sks.
Like other distributors of products that are in
g
ested, we face an inherent risk of exposure to product liabilit
y
claims if the use of our products results in illness or injury. The foods that we resell are subject to laws and
regu
l
at
i
ons,
i
nc
l
u
di
ng t
h
ose a
d
m
i
n
i
stere
db
yt
h
e USDA an
d
FDA t
h
at esta
bli
s
h
manu
f
actur
i
ng pract
i
ces an
d
qualit
y
standards for food products. Product liabilit
y
claims could have a material adverse effect on our busines
s
a
s we do not have contractual indemnification rights against our other suppliers, and our other remedies agains
t
16