Nutrisystem 2006 Annual Report Download - page 21

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 21 of the 2006 Nutrisystem annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 76

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76

Development of our Slim and Tone business may have a ne
g
ative impact on our core business.
D
eve
l
opment o
f
our S
li
man
d
Tone
b
us
i
ness may requ
i
re us to
di
vert some o
f
our cap
i
ta
l
resources an
d
mana
g
ement’s time awa
y
from our wei
g
ht mana
g
ement business. Since our Slim and Tone franchisees ar
e
independent third parties with their own financial ob
j
ectives, actions taken b
y
them, includin
g
breaches of thei
r
contractua
l
o
bli
gat
i
ons, may
h
ave negat
i
ve
i
mpact on
b
ot
h
our S
li
man
d
Tone an
d
Nutr
i
System
b
ran
d
s. Furt
h
er,
if we have to deal with disputes with our Slim and Tone franchisees re
g
ardin
g
operations and other contractual
issues, our mana
g
ement’s attention could be diverted which could have an adverse affect on our core business.
O
ur
S
lim and Tone subsidiary is subject to franchise law and regulations that govern its status as a
franchisor and re
g
ulate aspects of its franchise relationships. Slim and Tone’s ability to develop facilities
and to en
f
orce contractual r
ig
hts a
g
a
i
nst
i
ts
f
ranch
i
sees may be adversely a
ff
ected by these laws an
d
r
egulations, which could cause its franchise revenue to decline and adversely affect our growth strategy
.
Sli
man
d
Tone
i
ssu
bj
ect to
f
e
d
era
l
an
d
state
l
aws an
d
regu
l
at
i
ons,
i
nc
l
u
di
ng t
h
e regu
l
at
i
ons o
f
t
h
eFe
d
era
l
T
ra
d
e Comm
i
ss
i
on (t
h
e “FTC”), as we
ll
as s
i
m
il
ar aut
h
or
i
t
i
es
i
n
i
n
di
v
id
ua
l
states an
d
ot
h
er
j
ur
i
s
di
ct
i
ons,
i
n
connection with the offer, sale and termination of Slim and Tone franchises and the re
g
ulation of the franchisor-
f
ranc
hi
see re
l
at
i
ons
hi
p. Fa
il
ure to comp
l
yw
i
t
h
t
h
ese
l
aws cou
ld
su
bj
ect
b
ot
h
S
li
man
d
Tone an
d
us to
li
a
bili
ty to
f
ranc
hi
sees an
d
to
fi
nes or ot
h
er pena
l
t
i
es
i
mpose
dbyg
overnmenta
l
aut
h
or
i
t
i
es. In a
ddi
t
i
on, we ma
yb
ecom
e
sub
j
ect to liti
g
ation with, or other claims filed with state or federal authorities b
y
, Slim and Tone franchisee
s
b
ase
d
on a
ll
ege
d
un
f
a
i
r tra
d
e pract
i
ces,
i
mp
li
e
d
covenants o
f
goo
df
a
i
t
h
an
df
a
i
r
d
ea
li
ng, payment o
f
roya
l
t
i
es,
l
ocation of stores, advertisin
g
expenditures, franchise renewal criteria or express violations of franchise
ag
reements. Our Slim and Tone business ma
y
encounter compliance problems from time to time and material
di
sputes may ar
i
se w
i
t
h
one or more S
li
man
d
Tone
f
ranc
hi
sees. Accor
di
ng
l
y, S
li
man
d
Tone’s
f
a
il
ure to comp
l
y
with applicable franchise laws and re
g
ulations, or disputes with Slim and Tone franchisees, could have a material
a
dverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and
g
rowth strate
gy.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation may deter or delay an acquisition of us or prevent a change
in control, even if an acquisition or a chan
g
e of control would be beneficial to our stockholders
.
P
rovisions of our certificate of incorporation (as amended) ma
y
have the effect of deterrin
g
unsolicite
d
takeovers or dela
y
in
g
or preventin
g
a third part
y
from acquirin
g
control of us, even if our stockholders mi
g
h
t
o
t
h
erw
i
se rece
i
ve a prem
i
um
f
or t
h
e
i
rs
h
ares over t
h
en current mar
k
et pr
i
ces. In a
ddi
t
i
on, t
h
ese prov
i
s
i
ons ma
y
l
imit the abilit
y
of stockholders to approve transactions that the
y
ma
y
deem to be in their best interests
.
O
ur cert
ifi
cate o
fi
ncorporat
i
on (as amen
d
e
d
) perm
i
ts our Boar
d
o
f
D
i
rectors to
i
ssue pre
f
erre
d
stoc
k
without stockholder approval upon such terms as the Board of Directors ma
y
determine. The ri
g
hts of the holders
o
f our common stock will be
j
unior to, and ma
y
be adversel
y
affected b
y
, the ri
g
hts of the holders of an
y
pre
f
erre
d
stoc
k
t
h
at may
b
e
i
ssue
di
nt
h
e
f
uture. T
h
e
i
ssuance o
f
pre
f
erre
d
stoc
k
cou
ld h
ave t
h
ee
ff
ect o
f
ma
ki
ng
it more difficult for a third part
y
to acquire, or of discoura
g
in
g
a third part
y
from acquirin
g
,ama
j
orit
y
of our
o
utstandin
g
common stock. The issuance of a substantial number of preferred shares could adversel
y
affect the
pr
i
ce o
f
our common stoc
k
.
R
isks Related to Our Industr
y
The weight loss industry is subject to adverse publicity, which could harm our business.
T
he wei
g
ht loss industr
y
receives adverse publicit
y
from time to time, and the occurrence of such publicit
y
could
h
arm us, even if the adverse publicity is not directly related to us. In the early 1990s, our predecessor businesses wer
e
su
bj
ect to extreme
l
y
d
amag
i
ng a
d
verse pu
bli
c
i
ty re
l
at
i
ng to a
l
arge num
b
er o
fl
awsu
i
ts a
ll
eg
i
ng t
h
at t
h
e Nutr
i
Syste
m
wei
g
ht loss pro
g
ram led to
g
all bladder disease. This publicit
y
was a factor that contributed to the bankruptc
y
of ou
r
predecessor businesses in 1993. More recently, our predecessor businesses were severely impacted by significan
t
li
t
i
gat
i
on an
dd
amag
i
ng pu
bli
c
i
ty re
l
ate
d
to t
h
e
i
r customers’ use o
ff
en-p
h
en as an appet
i
te suppressant, w
hi
c
h
t
h
eFD
A
o
rdered withdrawn from the market in September 1997. The si
g
nificant decline in business resultin
g
from the fen-phen
problems caused our predecessor businesses to close all of their company-owned weight loss centers.
15