Medco 2014 Annual Report Download - page 90

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 90 of the 2014 Medco annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 116

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116

Express Scripts 2014 Annual Report
88
resolutionofoneormoreofsuchmatterscouldhaveamaterialadverseeffectonourresultsofoperationsinaparticular
quarterorfiscalyear.
SubsequenttotheMerger,wehaveexperiencedanincreaseinthenumberofinquiries,subpoenasandquitam
lawsuitsandinthevolumeofinformationrequestedrelatedthereto.Certaindatarequestshaveincludedseveralyearsof
informationfromlegacyacquiredsystemsthatinsomecasesmaynotbereadilyavailable.Theprocessoflocatingthedata
requestedistimeconsumingandlaborintensive,butisrequiredtoberesponsiveandcooperatewiththevariousinquiries.
Wecannotpredictthetimingoroutcomeofthemattersdescribedbelow.
• JerryBeeman,etal.v.Caremark,etal.PlaintiffsallegethatESIandtheotherdefendantsfailedtocomplywith
statutoryobligationstoprovideCaliforniaclientswiththeresultsofabi-annualsurveyofretaildrugprices.In
March2014,theNinthCircuitCourtofAppealsremandedthecasetothedistrictcourtforfurtherproceedings.
• (i)BradyEnterprises,Inc.,etal.v.MedcoHealthSolutions,Inc.(ii)NorthJacksonPharmacy,Inc.,etal.v.
ExpressScripts,Inc.,etal.(iii)Mike’sMedicalCenterPharmacy,etal.v.MedcoHealthSolutions,Inc.,etal.
PlaintiffsassertclaimsforviolationoftheShermanAntitrustAct.Currently,ESI’smotiontodecertifytheclassin
theBradyEnterprisescaseispending.OralargumentswereheldinJanuary2012.
• JasonBerkv.ExpressScripts,Inc.andExpressScriptsPharmacy,Inc.Acomplaintwasfiledbynamedemployee,
JasonBerk,acurrentPharmacyBenefitSpecialistemployee,alleging:(1)acollectiveactionunderthefederalFair
LaborStandardsActforfailuretopaywagesandovertime;and(2)aclassactionforbreachofcontract.The
partieshaveagreedtostaythelawsuitinfavorofearlyinvestigationandmediation.
• Wearethesubjectofvariousquitammatters.
◦ UnitedStatesofAmericaex.rel.LucasW.MathenyandDeborahLovelandv.MedcoHealthSolutions,
Inc.,etal(Medco’sformersubsidiaryPolyMedica).ThecomplaintallegesPolyMedicaviolatedtheFalse
ClaimsAct.InFebruary2014,thebankruptcycourt,presidingoverPolyMedica’sChapter11case,
grantedATLSAcquisitionLLC’sandPolyMedica’smotionforsummaryjudgmentonallrelators’claims
infull,butthecaseremainsstayedwithrespecttoMedco.
◦ UnitedStatesexrel.SteveGreenfield,etal.v.MedcoHealthSolutions,Inc.,AccredoHealthGroup,Inc.,
andHemophiliaHealthServices,Inc.ThecomplaintallegesdefendantsviolatedthefederalFalseClaims
Act,theAnti-KickbackStatute,theCivilMonetaryPenaltyStatuteandvariousstateandlocalfalseclaims
statutes.GreenfieldfiledanamendedcomplaintinOctober2014,andtheCompanyfiledananswerand
affirmativedefensesinNovember2014.
◦ UnitedStatesexrel.DavidM.Kester,etal.v.NovartisPharmaceuticalsCorp.,AccredoHealthGroup,
Inc.,BioScripCorp.,CuraScript,Inc.,CVSCaremarkCorp.Thecomplaintallegesdefendantsviolated
theAnti-KickbackStatute,thefederalFalseClaimsAct,andthefalseclaimsactsoftwenty-sevenstates.
InJanuary2015,thestateofWashingtonfiledamotiontoamenditscomplaintininterventiontoassert
claimsagainstAccredo,andAccredofiledabriefinoppositiontheretoinFebruary2015.
• Wehavereceivedandarecooperatingwithvarioussubpoenasfromgovernmentagenciesrequestinginformation.
Whilewebelieveourservicesandbusinesspracticesareinsubstantialcompliancewithapplicablelaws,rulesand
regulationsinallmaterialrespects,wecannotpredicttheoutcomeoftheseactionsatthistime.Anunfavorableoutcomeinone
ormoreofthesematterscouldresultintheimpositionofjudgments,monetaryfinesorpenaltiesorinjunctiveoradministrative
remedies.
84