Medco 2014 Annual Report Download - page 35

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 35 of the 2014 Medco annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 116

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116

33
Express Scripts 2014 Annual Report
interveneagainsttheremainingdefendants.InJanuary2014,KesterfiledacomplaintagainstAccredoand
CuraScript,Inc.(forpurposesofthisItem3,“CuraScript”)andallegesdefendantsviolatedtheAnti-KickbackStatute,
thefederalFalseClaimsAct,andthefalseclaimsactsoftwenty-sevenstatesinconnectionwithrebatesanddiscounts
providedinvariouscontractswithNovartisinvolvingthefollowingdrugs:Exjade,Gleevec,Tasigna,andTOBI.The
complaintseeksmonetarydamages,aswellascostsandexpenses. InJune2014,thecourtenteredanordergranting
defendants’motionstodismisswithrespecttoGleevec,Tasigna,andTOBI,anddeniedthemotionswithrespectto
Exjade.InSeptember2014,thecourtdeniedCuraScriptandAccredo’smotiontodismissforfailuretostateaclaim.
FollowingthefilingofKester’samendedcomplaint,inJanuary2015,thecourtdeniedAccredoandCuraScript’s
motiontodismiss.LaterinJanuary2015,thestateofWashingtonfiledamotiontoamenditscomplaintin
interventiontoassertclaimsagainstAccredo,andAccredofiledabriefinoppositiontheretoinFebruary2015.
• ATLSAcquisition,LLC,etal.,FGSTInvestments,Inc.,etal.v.MedcoHealthSolutions,Inc.(UnitedStates
BankruptcyCourtfortheDistrictofDelaware)(adversarycomplaintfiledMarch2014).InDecember2012,Medco
soldPolyMedicaCorporationanditssubsidiaries(“PolyMedica”),includingallassetsandliabilities,toFGST
Investments,Inc.(“FGST”)inamanagementbuyouttransaction.InFebruary2013,ATLSAcquisitionLLC
(“ATLS”),theparentcompanyofFGST,FGSTandPolyMedica(ATLS,FGSTandPolyMedicaarecollectively
referredtoas“Debtors”),filedforChapter11bankruptcyprotection.InMarch2014,Debtorsfiledacomplaint
againstMedcoallegingbreachofcontract,specificperformance,indemnity,breachoffinancialstatementswarranty,
declaratoryjudgment,avoidanceoftransfersbasedonconstructiveandactualfraud,anddisallowanceand
subordinationofMedco’sclaims.DebtorsseekpaymentofPolyMedica’spre-closingtaxesandothercreditors’
claims.InMarch2014,DebtorsfiledobjectionstoproofsofclaimsfiledbyMedco.InMarch2014,Debtorsfileda
motionforpartialsummaryjudgmentastothepre-closingtaxes.InMay2014,Medcofiledananswerand
counterclaimtotheadversarycomplaint,amotiontodismisstheadversaryproceeding,andapartialcrossmotionfor
summaryjudgmentseekingreformationofthestockpurchaseagreementontheissueofpre-closingtaxes.Debtors
filedareplytoMedco’scounterclaim,anansweringbriefinoppositiontoMedco’smotiontodismiss,andabriefin
oppositiontoMedco’scrossmotionforpartialsummaryjudgmentinMay2014.InAugust2014,Debtorsfiledajoint
planofreorganization.InSeptember2014,Debtorsfiledamotionforentryofordersincludingbutnotlimitedto
approvingbidproceduresrelatedtothesaleofassets,approvingbidprotections,schedulingahearingforconsidering
sale,approvingtheassetpurchaseagreementandauthorizingthesale.TheauctionofDebtors’assetsoccurredin
November2014.
• JasonBerkv.ExpressScripts,Inc.andExpressScriptsPharmacy,Inc.(UnitedStatesDistrictCourtfortheDistrictof
Minnesota,CaseNo.0:14-cv-01008)(filedApril8,2014).AcomplaintwasfiledagainstExpressScripts,Inc.and
ExpressScriptsPharmacy,Inc.,itssubsidiary,bynamedemployee,JasonBerk,acurrentPharmacyBenefitSpecialist
employee,allegingtwocausesofaction:(1)acollectiveactionunderthefederalFairLaborStandardsAct,29U.S.C.
§216(b),forfailuretopaywagesandovertime;and(2)aFederalRuleofCivilProcedure23classactionforbreach
ofcontract.Thepartieshaveagreedtostaythelawsuitinfavorofearlyinvestigationandmediation.
• InJuly2011,MedcoreceivedasubpoenaducestecumfromtheUnitedStatesDepartmentofJustice,Districtof
Delaware,requestinginformationfromMedcoregardingitsarrangementswithAstraZenecaconcerningfourAstra
Zenecadrugs.Medcoiscooperatingwiththeinquiry.TheCompanyisnotabletopredictwithcertaintythetimingor
outcomeofthismatter.
• OnFebruary27,2014,theCompanyreceivedasubpoenaducestecumfromtheUnitedStatesDepartmentofJustice,
DistrictofRhodeIsland,pursuantto18U.S.C.Section24(a),requestinginformationregardingtheCompany’s
contractualarrangementswithPfizer,BayerEMDSeronoandbiogenidecconcerningthefollowingdrugs:Betaseron,
RebifandAvonex.TheCompanyintendstocooperatewiththeinquiryandisnotabletopredictwithcertaintythe
timingoroutcomeofthismatter.
• OnMarch31,2014,theCompanyreceivedasubpoenaducestecumfromtheAttorneyGeneralofNewJersey,
requestinginformationregardingESI’sandMedco’sarrangementswithAstraZenecaconcerningthedrugNexium.
TheCompanyintendstocooperatewiththeinquiryandisnotabletopredictwithcertaintythetimingoroutcomeof
thismatter.
• OnApril8,2014,theCompanyreceivedasubpoenafromtheUnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor,EmployeeBenefits
SecurityAdministrationrequestinginformationregardingESI’sandMedco’sclientrelationshipsfrom2009tothe
present.TheCompanyintendstocooperatewiththeinquiryandisnotabletopredictwithcertaintythetimingor
outcomeofthismatter.
• OnAugust23,2013,theCompanyreceivedafederalgrandjurysubpoenafromtheUnitedStatesAttorney’sOffice
fortheNorthernDistrictofCalifornia.ThesubpoenarequestsinformationfromJanuary1,2003tothepresent
regardingMedco’srelationshipwithAlfredVillalobos(“Villalobos”)andARVCOCapitalResearchLLC
29