Carnival Cruises 2014 Annual Report Download - page 32

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 32 of the 2014 Carnival Cruises annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 80

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80

At July 31, 2014, our cruise brands that have significant trademarks recorded include AIDA, P&O Cruises
(Australia), P&O Cruises (UK) and Princess. As of that date, we performed our annual trademark impairment
reviews for these cruise brands, which included performing a qualitative assessment for AIDA, P&O Cruises
(Australia) and Princess. Qualitative factors such as industry and market conditions, macroeconomic conditions,
changes to the WACC, changes in royalty rates and overall financial performance were considered in the
qualitative assessment to determine how changes in these factors would affect the estimated fair values for each
of these cruise brands’ recorded trademarks. Based on our qualitative assessments, we determined it was more
likely-than-not that the estimated fair value for AIDA’s, P&O Cruises (Australia)’s and Princess’ recorded
trademarks exceeded their carrying value and, therefore, none of these trademarks were impaired.
As of July 31, 2014, we also performed our annual trademark impairment review of P&O Cruises (UK). We did
not perform a qualitative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the quantitative trademark impairment
review. Our quantitative assessment included estimating P&O Cruises (UK)’s trademarks fair value based upon a
discounted future cash flow analysis, which estimated the amount of royalties that we are relieved from having to
pay for use of the associated trademarks, based upon forecasted cruise revenues and a market participant’s
royalty rate. The royalty rate was estimated primarily using comparable royalty agreements for similar industries.
Based on our quantitative assessment, we determined that the estimated fair value for P&O Cruises (UK)’s
trademarks significantly exceeded their carrying values and, therefore, none of these trademarks were impaired.
In 2013, we recognized a $14 million impairment charge related to an investment, leaving an insignificant
carrying value at November 30, 2014 and 2013. In 2012, we recognized a $20 million impairment charge to
write-off a portion of Ibero’s trademarks’ carrying value.
At November 30, 2014 and 2013, our intangible assets subject to amortization are not significant to our
consolidated financial statements.
The determination of our cruise brand, cruise ship and trademark fair values includes numerous assumptions that
are subject to various risks and uncertainties. We believe that we have made reasonable estimates and judgments
in determining whether our goodwill, cruise ships and trademarks have been impaired. However, if there is a
change in assumptions used or if there is a change in the conditions or circumstances influencing fair values in
the future, then we may need to recognize an impairment charge.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We utilize derivative and nonderivative financial instruments, such as foreign currency forwards, options and
swaps, foreign currency debt obligations and foreign currency cash balances, to manage our exposure to
fluctuations in certain foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate
exposure in order to achieve a desired proportion of fixed and floating rate debt. In addition, we utilize our fuel
derivatives program to mitigate a portion of the risk to our future cash flows attributable to potential fuel price
increases, which we define as our “economic risk.” Our policy is to not use any financial instruments for trading
or other speculative purposes.
All derivatives are recorded at fair value. The changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings if the
derivatives do not qualify as effective hedges, or if we do not seek to qualify for hedge accounting treatment,
such as for our fuel derivatives. If a derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, then changes in the fair value
of the derivative are offset against the changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item. If a derivative is
designated as a cash flow hedge, then the effective portion of the changes in the fair value of the derivative is
recognized as a component of AOCI until the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings or the forecasted
transaction is no longer probable. If a derivative or a nonderivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge
of our net investment in a foreign operation, then changes in the fair value of the financial instrument are
recognized as a component of AOCI to offset a portion of the change in the translated value of the net investment
being hedged, until the investment is sold or substantially liquidated. We formally document hedging
relationships for all derivative and nonderivative hedges and the underlying hedged items, as well as our risk
management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge transactions.
30