Western Digital 2001 Annual Report Download - page 56

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 56 of the 2001 Western Digital annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 82

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82

WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Ì (Continued)
On May 22, 2001, Cambrian Consultants, Inc. (""Cambrian'') Ñled a complaint against the Company in
the United States District Court, Central District of California. The suit alleges infringement by the Company
of a Cambrian patent. On July 20, 2001, the Company Ñled an answer denying the allegations contained in
Cambrian's complaint and a counter claim asserting that Cambrian's patent was invalid. The Court ordered
that a Markman hearing to construe the claims of Cambrian's patent be held on April 15, 2002 and set a
brieÑng schedule leading up to the hearing. Both parties are engaged in discovery and expect that such
discovery will continue for at least the next several months. Based on its initial investigation and the limited
discovery done to date, the Company does not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material
adverse eÅect on its consolidated Ñnancial position, results of operation or liquidity.
On July 5, 2001, the Company (and its Malaysian subsidiary) Ñled suit against Cirrus Logic, Inc.
(""Cirrus'') in California Superior Court for the County of Orange for breach of contract and other claims
resulting from Cirrus' role as a strategic supplier of read channel chips for the Company's hard drives. The
Company also stopped making payments to Cirrus for past deliveries of chips and terminated all outstanding
purchase orders from Cirrus for such chips. The Company's complaint alleges that Cirrus' unlawful conduct
caused damages in excess of any amounts that may be owing on outstanding invoices or arising out of any
alleged breach of the outstanding purchase orders. On August 20, 2001, Cirrus Ñled an answer and cross-
complaint. Cirrus denied the allegations contained in the Company's complaint and asserted counterclaims
against the Company for, among other things, the amount of the outstanding invoices and the Company's
alleged breach of the outstanding purchase orders. The parties have begun discovery and expect that such
discovery will continue for the next several months. Based on its initial investigation and the limited discovery
done to date, the Company does not believe that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse eÅect
on its consolidated Ñnancial position, results of operation or liquidity.
In the normal course of business, the Company receives and makes inquiries regarding possible
intellectual property matters, including alleged patent infringement. Where deemed advisable, the Company
may seek or extend licenses or negotiate settlements. Although patent holders often oÅer such licenses, no
assurance can be given that in a particular case a license will be oÅered or that the oÅered terms will be
acceptable to the Company. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will
have a material adverse eÅect on its consolidated Ñnancial position, results of operations or liquidity.
From time to time the Company receives claims and is a party to suits and other judicial and
administrative proceedings incidental to its business. Although occasional adverse decisions (or settlements)
may occur, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material
adverse eÅect on its consolidated Ñnancial position, results of operations or liquidity.
46