Lockheed Martin 2015 Annual Report Download - page 30

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 30 of the 2015 Lockheed Martin annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 130

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.
We are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our
business, including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment, and are subject to
contingencies related to certain businesses we previously owned. These types of matters could result in fines, penalties,
compensatory or treble damages or non-monetary sanctions or relief. We believe the probability is remote that the outcome
of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Corporation as a whole, notwithstanding that the unfavorable
resolution of any matter may have a material effect on our net earnings in any particular interim reporting period. We cannot
predict the outcome of legal or other proceedings with certainty. These matters include the proceedings summarized in
“Note 14 – Legal Proceedings, Commitments and Contingencies” of our consolidated financial statements.
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign requirements for protection of the environment, including those for
discharge of hazardous materials and remediation of contaminated sites. As a result, we are a party to or have property
subject to various lawsuits or proceedings involving environmental protection matters. Due in part to their complexity and
pervasiveness, such requirements have resulted in us being involved with related legal proceedings, claims and remediation
obligations. The extent of our financial exposure cannot in all cases be reasonably estimated at this time. For information
regarding these matters, including current estimates of the amounts that we believe are required for remediation or clean-up
to the extent estimable, see “Critical Accounting Policies – Environmental Matters” in Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and “Note 14 – Legal Proceedings, Commitments and
Contingencies” of our consolidated financial statements.
On October 26, 2015, the New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) related to a
hazardous waste compliance evaluation that NMED conducted at Sandia National Laboratories in April 2015. Sandia Corporation
manages Sandia National Laboratories on behalf of the Department of Energy. The NOV sets forth several violations of New
Mexico’s Hazardous Waste Regulations generally related to alleged failures to: make hazardous waste determinations, determine if
waste meets land disposal standards, prepare proper manifests, properly train personnel, complete inspection forms, maintain
inspection records, properly label waste and comply with time-based waste storage limits. Unlawful disposal of waste as a result of
the foregoing was also alleged. NMED proposed a civil penalty of approximately $151,000 which Sandia Corporation paid. We do
not currently believe that it is probable that we will incur a material loss related to this matter.
We have reached an agreement to settle with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the qui tam relators two previously
disclosed lawsuits in which the DOJ filed complaints in partial intervention on August 28, 2003. The lawsuits, United States ex
rel. Natural Resources Defense Council, et al., v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al., and United States ex rel. John D. Tillson
v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc., et al., were filed by the relators in 1999 under the civil qui tam provisions of the False
Claims Act in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky and alleged that we committed violations of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant by not properly handling, storing
and transporting hazardous waste and that we violated the False Claims Act by misleading Department of Energy officials and
state regulators about the nature and extent of environmental noncompliance at the plant. The parties are finalizing the terms of
the settlement agreement, which is considered a tentative agreement until it is formally approved by the United States
Government. Under the terms of our agreement, we will pay $5 million, of which $4 million will be allocated to all Defendants,
including the Corporation and its predecessor, Martin Marietta Corporation; wholly-owned subsidiary Lockheed Martin Energy
Systems, Inc. and its predecessor, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.; and wholly-owned subsidiary Lockheed Martin Utility
Services, Inc. and its predecessor Martin Marietta Utility Services, Inc. and the False Claims Act allegations; $500,000 will be
allocated to Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc. and RCRA civil penalties; and $500,000 will be allocated to Lockheed
Martin Utility Services, Inc. and RCRA civil penalties. We believe that we have substantial defenses to all of the allegations and
have agreed to settle the case to avoid the costs of further litigation of this matter which has been ongoing in excess of sixteen
years. We will admit no liability or wrongdoing in resolving the matter.
As a U.S. Government contractor, we are subject to various audits and investigations by the U.S. Government to
determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. U.S.
Government investigations of us, whether relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons, could result in
administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, suspension,
proposed debarment, debarment from eligibility for future U.S. Government contracting, or suspension of export privileges.
Suspension or debarment could have a material adverse effect on us because of our dependence on contracts with the U.S.
Government. U.S. Government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us.
We also provide products and services to customers outside of the U.S., which are subject to U.S. and foreign laws and
regulations and foreign procurement policies and practices. Our compliance with local regulations or applicable U.S.
Government regulations also may be audited or investigated.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
22