Famous Footwear 2012 Annual Report Download - page 23

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 23 of the 2012 Famous Footwear annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 96

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96

2012 BROWN SHOE COMPANY, INC. FORM 10-K 21
We are subject to periodic litigation and other regulatory proceedings, which could result in the unexpected expenditure of
time and resources.
We are a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory actions (including environmental matters) relating to our
business and to our past operations. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot
accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation
or regulatory proceedings, such proceedings are expensive and will require that we devote substantial resources and
executive time to defend, thereby diverting management’s attention and resources that are needed to successfully run our
business. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for further discussion of pending matters.
Rising insurance costs could adversely aect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We self-insure a significant portion of our expected losses under our workers’ compensation, employment practices, health,
disability, cyber risk, general liability, automobile and property programs, among others. The liabilities associated with the
risks that are retained by us are estimated by considering our historical claims experience and data from actuarial sources.
The estimated accruals for these liabilities could be aected if claims dier from the assumptions used and historical
trends. Unanticipated changes in the estimates underlying our reserves for these losses, such as claims experience,
inflation and regulatory changes, could have a material adverse eect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Comprehensive health care reform legislation provisions have become eective which, among other things, includes
guaranteed coverage requirements, eliminates pre-existing condition exclusions and annual lifetime maximum limits,
restricts the extent to which policies can be rescinded and imposes new and significant taxes on healthy insurers and
health care benefits. Possible adverse eects of the health reform legislation include increased costs, exposure to
expanded liability and requirements for us to revise ways in which we conduct business.
We are subject to legislative or regulatory initiatives related to global warming/climate change concerns, which could
negatively aect our business.
There has been an increasing focus and debate on global climate change, including increased attention from regulatory
agencies and legislative bodies. This increased focus may lead to new initiatives directed at regulating an unspecified array
of environmental matters. Legislative, regulatory or other eorts to globally combat climate change could have negative
implications, including, but not limited to, future tax increases, increased costs of transportation and utilities and other cost
increases imposed on foreign sources of production, all of which could decrease our operating earnings. We are unable to
predict the potential eects that any such future initiatives may have on our business.
ITEM 1B UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC sta 180 days or more before the end of
our fiscal year relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
ITEM 2 PROPERTIES
We own our principal executive, sales and administrative oces located in Clayton (“St. Louis”), Missouri.
Our retail footwear operations are conducted throughout the United States, Canada, China and Guam and involve the
operation of 1,277 shoe stores, including 90 in Canada and 26 in China. All store locations are leased, with approximately
56% of them having renewal options. Famous Footwear operates a leased 800,000 square-foot distribution center, including
mezzanine levels, in Lebanon, Tennessee, and a leased 380,000 square-foot distribution center, including a mezzanine level,
in Bakersfield, California. We also operate an owned 150,000 square-foot distribution facility in Perth, Ontario.
Our Wholesale Operations segment utilizes leased oce space in New York, New York, where we also maintain showrooms
for our wholesale brands, and leased oce space located in Irvine, California (“Los Angeles”). Our Canada wholesale
division operates from an owned building in Perth, Ontario and from leased oce space in Laval, Quebec. We also lease
oce space in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Italy, four sample-making facilities in Dongguan, Putian and JiangXi, China
and we lease two manufacturing facilities in JiangXi, China. The footwear sold through our domestic Wholesale Operations
is processed through one of two main distribution centers: a third-party facility in Chino, California and a 320,000 square-
foot leased facility in Fontana, California. During 2012, we began to close our owned Sikeston, Missouri, distribution center,
which has 720,000 square feet, including mezzanine levels.
We own a vacant manufacturing facility in Stirling, Ontario; an oce building in Perth, Ontario, which is leased to a third-
party; a building in Denver, Colorado, which is leased to a third-party; and undeveloped land in Colorado and New York.
See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, for further discussion of certain of these properties.