Expedia 2015 Annual Report Download - page 57

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 57 of the 2015 Expedia annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 147

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147

customer payment we retain. Some jurisdictions have questioned our practice in this regard. While the applicable
tax provisions vary among the jurisdictions, we generally believe that we are not required to pay such occupancy
taxes. We are engaged in discussions with tax authorities in various jurisdictions to resolve this issue. Some tax
authorities have brought lawsuits or have levied assessments asserting that we are required to collect and remit
occupancy tax. The ultimate resolution in all jurisdictions cannot be determined at this time. Certain jurisdictions
may require us to pay tax assessments, including occupancy and other transactional tax assessments, prior to
contesting any such assessments.
We have established a reserve for the potential settlement of issues related to hotel occupancy taxes for prior
and current periods, consistent with applicable accounting principles and in light of all current facts and
circumstances. A variety of factors could affect the amount of the liability (both past and future), which factors
include, but are not limited to, the number of, and amount of revenue represented by, jurisdictions that ultimately
assert a claim and prevail in assessing such additional tax or negotiate a settlement and changes in relevant
statutes.
We note that there are more than 7,000 taxing jurisdictions in the United States, and it is not feasible to
analyze the statutes, regulations and judicial and administrative rulings in every jurisdiction. Rather, we have
obtained the advice of state and local tax experts with respect to tax laws of certain states and local jurisdictions
that represent a large portion of our hotel revenue. Many of the statutes and regulations that impose hotel
occupancy taxes were established before the emergence of the internet and e-commerce. Certain jurisdictions
have enacted, and others may enact, legislation regarding the imposition of occupancy taxes on businesses that
arrange the booking of hotel accommodations. We continue to work with the relevant tax authorities and
legislators to clarify our obligations under new and emerging laws and regulations. We will continue to monitor
the issue closely and provide additional disclosure, as well as adjust the level of reserves, as developments
warrant. Additionally, certain of our businesses are involved in occupancy tax related litigation, which is
discussed in Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings. Recent occupancy tax developments are also discussed below
under the caption “Occupancy and Other Taxes.”
Stock-Based Compensation
Our primary form of employee stock-based compensation is stock option awards. We measure the value of
stock option awards on the date of grant at fair value using the appropriate valuation techniques, including the
Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo option-pricing models. We amortize the fair value, net of estimated forfeitures,
over the remaining term on a straight-line basis. The pricing models require various highly judgmental
assumptions including volatility and expected option term. If any of the assumptions used in the models change
significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the
current period.
We record stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. In determining the estimated
forfeiture rates for stock-based awards, we periodically conduct an assessment of the actual number of equity
awards that have been forfeited to date as well as those expected to be forfeited in the future. We consider many
factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including the type of award, the employee class and historical
experience. The estimate of stock awards that will ultimately be forfeited requires significant judgment and to the
extent that actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as
a cumulative adjustment in the period such estimates are revised.
New Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies in the
notes to consolidated financial statements.
53