Eversource 2014 Annual Report Download - page 34

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 34 of the 2014 Eversource annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 136

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136

22
other rights and powers, the right and power to manufacture, generate, purchase, transmit and distribute natural gas and to erect and maintain certain
facilities on public highways and grounds, and the right of eminent domain, all subject to such consents and approvals of public authorities and others
as may be required by law.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
1. Yankee Companies v. U.S. Department of Energy
 -In 1998, the Yankee Companies (CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC) filed separate complaints against the DOE in the Court of
Federal Claims seeking monetary damages resulting from the DOE's failure to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel for disposal by January 31, 1998
pursuant to the terms of the 1983 spent fuel and high level waste disposal contracts between the Yankee Companies and the DOE (DOE Phase I
Damages). Phase I covered damages for the period 1998 through 2002. Following multiple appeals and cross-appeals in December 2012, the
judgment awarding CYAPC $39.6 million, YAEC $38.3 million and MYAPC $81.7 million became final.
In January 2013, the proceeds from the DOE Phase I Damages Claim were received by the Yankee Companies and transferred to each Yankee
Company's respective decommissioning trust.
In June 2013, FERC approved CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC to reduce rates in their wholesale power contracts through the application of the DOE
proceeds for the benefit of customers. Changes to the terms of the wholesale power contracts became effective on July 1, 2013. In accordance with
the FERC order, CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH and WMECO began receiving the benefit of the DOE proceeds, and the benefits have been passed
on to customers.
On September 17, 2014, in accordance with the MYAPC refund plan, MYAPC returned a portion of the DOE Phase I Damages proceeds to the
member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, in the amount of $3.2 million, $1.1 million, $1.4 million and $0.8
million, respectively.
 -In December 2007, the Yankee Companies each filed subsequent lawsuits against the DOE seeking recovery of actual
damages incurred related to the alleged failure of the DOE to provide for a permanent facility to store spent nuclear fuel generated in years 2001
through 2008 for CYAPC and YAEC and from 2002 through 2008 for MYAPC (DOE Phase II Damages). In November 2013, the court issued a
final judgment awarding CYAPC $126.3 million, YAEC $73.3 million, and MYAPC $35.8 million. On January 14, 2014, the Yankee Companies
received a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice stating that the DOE will not appeal the court's final judgment.
In March and April 2014, CYAPC, YAEC and MYAPC received payment of $126.3 million, $73.3 million and $35.8 million, respectively, of the
DOE Phase II Damages proceeds and made the required informational filing with FERC in accordance with the process and methodology outlined in
the 2013 FERC order. The Yankee Companies returned the DOE Phase II Damages proceeds to the member companies, including CL&P, NSTAR
Electric, PSNH, and WMECO, for the benefit of their respective customers, on June 1, 2014. Refunds to CL&P's, NSTAR Electric's, PSNH's and
WMECO's customers for these DOE proceeds began in the third quarter of 2014.
-In August 2013, the Yankee Companies each filed subsequent lawsuits against the DOE seeking recovery of actual
damages incurred in the years 2009 through 2012. The presiding judge issued a Pre-Trial Scheduling Order on September 3, 2014 that set the case
for trial from June 30 to July 2, 2015. The Order also established January 5, 2015 for the close of fact discovery and March 30, 2015 as the close of
expert discovery. Expert discovery is ongoing.
2. Conservation Law Foundation v. PSNH
On July 21, 2011, the Conservation Law Foundation (CLF) filed a citizens suit under the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act against PSNH
alleging permitting violations at the company's Merrimack generating station. The suit alleges that PSNH failed to have proper permits for
replacement of the Unit 2 turbine at Merrimack, installation of activated carbon injection equipment for the unit, and violated a permit condition
concerning operation of the electrostatic precipitators at the station. On September 27, 2012, the federal court dismissed portions of CLF's suit
pertaining to the installation of activated carbon injection and the electrostatic precipitators. CLF filed an amended complaint on May 28, 2013,
related to routine maintenance of the boiler performed in 2008 and 2009. The suit seeks injunctive relief, civil penalties, and costs. CLF has pursued
similar claims before the NHPUC, the N.H. Air Resources Council, and the N.H. Site Evaluation Committee, all of which have been denied. PSNH
believes this suit is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. The deadline for summary judgment is November 2015. Trial is scheduled for
the spring of 2016.
3. Other Legal Proceedings
For further discussion of legal proceedings, see Item 1,  "- Electric Distribution Segment," "-Electric Transmission Segment," and "-
Natural Gas Distribution Segment" for information about various state regulatory and rate proceedings, civil lawsuits related thereto, and information
about proceedings relating to power, transmission and pricing issues; "-Nuclear Fuel Storage" for information related to high-level nuclear waste;
and "-Other Regulatory and Environmental Matters" for information about proceedings involving surface water and air quality requirements, toxic
substances and hazardous waste, electric and magnetic fields, licensing of hydroelectric projects, and other matters. In addition, see Item 1A, 
, for general information about several significant risks.