Eli Lilly 2008 Annual Report Download - page 37

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 37 of the 2008 Eli Lilly annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 132

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132

FINANCIALS
35
Lilly S&P 500 Peer Group
This graph compares the return on Lilly stock with that of the
Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and our peer group* for the years
2004 through 2008. The graph assumes that, on December 31, 2003,
a person invested $100 each in Lilly stock, the S&P 500 Stock Index,
and the peer group’s common stock. The graph measures total
shareholder return, which takes into account both stock price and
dividends. It assumes that dividends paid by a company are
reinvested in that company’s stock.
*We constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph.
It comprises the nine companies in the pharmaceutical industry that
we used to benchmark 2008 compensation of executive officers:
Abbott Laboratories; Amgen Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company;
GlaxoSmithKline Plc; Johnson & Johnson; Merck & Co., Inc.; Pfizer
Inc.; Schering-Plough Corporation; and Wyeth.
Value of $100 Invested on Last Business Day of 2003
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return Among Lilly, S&P 500 Stock Index, and Peer Group*
12/03 12/04 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08
$150
$140
$130
$120
$110
$100
$90
$80
$70
$60
Date Lilly Peer
Group S&P
500
12/03 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
12/04 $ 82.53 $ 96.91 $110.85
12/05 $ 84.62 $ 96.99 $116.28
12/06 $ 80.20 $109.85 $134.61
12/07 $ 84.76 $111.60 $141.99
12/08 $ 66.63 $ 93.90 $ 89.54
Selected Financial Data (unaudited)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in millions, except net sales per employee and per-share data) 2008 20072 2006 2005 2004
Operations
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,378.0 $18,633.5 $15,691.0 $14,645.3 $13,857.9
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,382.8 4,248.8 3,546.5 3,474.2 3,223.9
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,840.9 3,486.7 3,129.3 3,025.5 2,691.1
Marketing, selling, and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . 6,626.4 6,095.1 4,889.8 4,497.0 4,284.2
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,835.54 926.1 707.4 931.1 716.8
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle . . . . . . (1,307.6) 3,876.8 3,418.0 2,717.5 2,941.9
Income taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 764.3 923.8 755.3 715.9 1,131.8
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,071.9) 2,953.0 2,662.7 1,979.61 1,810.1
Net income as a percent of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NM 15.8% 17.0% 13.5% 13.1%
Net income (loss) per sharediluted . . . . . . . . . . . . (1.89) 2.71 2.45 1.81 1.66
Dividends declared per share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.90 1.75 1.63 1.54 1.45
Weighted-average number of shares
outstanding—diluted (thousands) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,094,499 1,090,750 1,087,490 1,092,150 1,088,936
Financial Position
Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,453.3 $12,316.1 $ 9,753.6 $10,855.0 $12,895.0
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,109.7 5,436.8 5,254.0 5,884.8 7,762.2
Property and equipment—net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,626.3 8,575.1 8,152.3 7,912.5 7,550.9
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,212.6 26,874.8 22,042.4 24,667.8 24,954.0
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,615.7 4,593.5 3,494.4 5,763.5 4,491.9
Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,735.3 13,503.9 10,820.2 10,631.4 10,759.4
Supplementary Data
Return on shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (16.3)% 24.3% 24.8% 18.5% 17.8%
Return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7.5)% 12.1% 11.1% 8.2% 7.8%
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 947.2 $ 1,082.4 $ 1,077.8 $ 1,298.1 $ 1,898.1
Depreciation and amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,122.6 1,047.9 801.8 726.4 597.5
Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NM3 23.8% 22.1% 26.3% 38.5%
Net sales per employee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 504,000 $ 459,000 $378,000 $344,000 $311,000
Number of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,450 40,600 41,500 42,600 44,500
Number of shareholders of record . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39,800 41,700 44,800 50,800 52,400
NM—Not Meaningful
1Refl ects the impact of a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in 2005 of $22.0 million, net of income taxes of $11.8 mil-
lion. The diluted earnings per share impact of this cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle was $.02. The net income per
diluted share before the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle was $1.83.
2Refl ects the ICOS acquisition, effective January 29, 2007. See Note 3 for additional information.
3We incurred tax expense of $764.3 million in 2008, despite having a loss before income taxes of $1.31 billion. Our net loss was driven by
the $4.69 billion acquired IPR&D charge for ImClone and the $1.48 billion Zyprexa investigation settlements. The IPR&D charge was not
tax deductible, and only a portion of the Zyprexa investigation settlements was deductible. In addition, we recorded tax expense associ-
ated with the ImClone acquisition, as well as a discrete income tax bene t of $210.3 million for the resolution of the IRS audit.
4The increase refl ects the in-process research and development expense of $4.69 billion associated with the ImClone acquisition and
$1.48 billion associated with the Zyprexa investigation settlements.