CenterPoint Energy 2009 Annual Report Download - page 63

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 63 of the 2009 CenterPoint Energy annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 150

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150

41
CenterPoint Houston deferred the uninsured system restoration costs as management believed it was probable that
such costs would be recovered through the regulatory process. As a result, system restoration costs did not affect
CenterPoint Energy’s or CenterPoint Houston’s reported operating income for 2008 or 2009.
Legislation enacted by the Texas Legislature in April 2009 authorized the Texas Utility Commission to conduct
proceedings to determine the amount of system restoration costs and related costs associated with hurricanes or
other major storms that utilities are entitled to recover, and to issue financing orders that would permit a utility like
CenterPoint Houston to recover the distribution portion of those costs and related carrying costs through the
issuance of non-recourse system restoration bonds similar to the securitization bonds issued previously. The
legislation also allowed such a utility to recover, or defer for future recovery, the transmission portion of its system
restoration costs through the existing mechanisms established to recover transmission costs.
Pursuant to such legislation, CenterPoint Houston filed with the Texas Utility Commission an application for
review and approval for recovery of approximately $678 million, including approximately $608 million in system
restoration costs identified as of the end of February 2009, plus $2 million in regulatory expenses, $13 million in
certain debt issuance costs and $55 million in incurred and projected carrying costs calculated through August 2009.
In July 2009, CenterPoint Houston announced a settlement agreement with the parties to the proceeding. Under that
settlement agreement, CenterPoint Houston was entitled to recover a total of $663 million in costs relating to
Hurricane Ike, along with carrying costs from September 1, 2009 until system restoration bonds were issued. The
Texas Utility Commission issued an order in August 2009 approving CenterPoint Houston’s application and the
settlement agreement and authorizing recovery of $663 million, of which $643 million was attributable to
distribution service and eligible for securitization and the remaining $20 million was attributable to transmission
service and eligible for recovery through the existing mechanisms established to recover transmission costs.
In July 2009, CenterPoint Houston filed with the Texas Utility Commission its application for a financing order to
recover the portion of approved costs related to distribution service through the issuance of system restoration
bonds. In August 2009, the Texas Utility Commission issued a financing order allowing CenterPoint Houston to
securitize $643 million in distribution service costs plus carrying charges from September 1, 2009 through the date
the system restoration bonds were issued, as well as certain up-front qualified costs capped at approximately
$6 million. In November 2009, CenterPoint Houston issued approximately $665 million of system restoration
bonds through its CenterPoint Energy Restoration Bond Company, LLC subsidiary with interest rates of 1.833% to
4.243% and final maturity dates ranging from February 2016 to August 2023. The bonds will be repaid over time
through a charge imposed on customers.
In accordance with the financing order, CenterPoint Houston also placed a separate customer credit in effect
when the storm restoration bonds were issued. That credit (ADFIT Credit) is applied to customers’ bills while the
bonds are outstanding to reflect the benefit of accumulated deferred federal income taxes (ADFIT) associated with
the storm restoration costs (including a carrying charge of 11.075%). The beginning balance of the ADFIT related to
storm restoration costs was approximately $207 million and will decline over the life of the system restoration bonds
as taxes are paid on the system restoration tariffs. The ADFIT Credit will reduce operating income in 2010 by
approximately $24 million.
In accordance with the orders discussed above, as of December 31, 2009, CenterPoint Houston has recorded $651
million associated with distribution-related storm restoration costs as a net regulatory asset and $20 million
associated with transmission-related storm restoration costs, of which $18 million is recorded in property, plant and
equipment and $2 million of related carrying costs is recorded in regulatory assets. These amounts reflect carrying
costs of $60 million related to distribution and $2 million related to transmission through December 31, 2009, based
on the 11.075% cost of capital approved by the Texas Utility Commission. The carrying costs have been bifurcated
into two components: (i) return of borrowing costs and (ii) an allowance for earnings on shareholders’ investment.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the component representing a return of borrowing costs of $23 million
has been recognized and is included in other income in our Statements of Consolidated Income. The component
representing an allowance for earnings on shareholders’ investment of $39 million is being deferred and will be
recognized as it is collected through rates.