AMD 2011 Annual Report Download - page 22

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 22 of the 2011 AMD annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 140

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140

and soil; remediation requirements; product chemical content limitations; manufacturing chemical use and
handling restrictions; pollution control requirements; waste minimization considerations; and requirements with
respect to treatment, transport, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. If we fail to comply with any
of the applicable environmental regulations we may be subject to fines, suspension of production, alteration of
our manufacturing processes, import/export restrictions, sales limitations, and/or criminal and civil liabilities.
Existing or future regulations could require us to procure expensive pollution abatement or remediation
equipment; to modify product designs; or to incur other expenses to comply with environmental regulations. Any
failure to adequately control the use, disposal or storage, or discharge of hazardous substances could expose us to
future liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business. We believe we are in material
compliance with applicable environmental requirements and do not expect those requirements to result in
material expenditures in the foreseeable future.
Environmental laws are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time.
We face increasing complexity in our product design and procurement operations as we adjust to new and future
requirements relating to the chemical and material composition of our products. For example, the European
Union (EU) and China are two among a growing number of jurisdictions that have enacted in recent years
restrictions on the use of lead, among other chemicals, in electronic products with other countries implementing
similar restrictions. These regulations affect semiconductor devices and packaging. There is a risk that the cost,
quality and manufacturing yields of products that are required to be lead-free, as defined by these regulations, or
that are subject to other chemical restrictions, may be less favorable compared to products that are not subject to
chemical restrictions, or that the transition to products subject to lead-free or other chemical restrictions may
produce sudden changes in demand, which may result in excess inventory.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires the SEC to establish new
disclosure and reporting requirements for those companies who use “conflict” minerals mined from the
Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries in their products, whether or not these products are
manufactured by third parties. When these new requirements are implemented, they could affect the sourcing and
availability of minerals used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, and there will be additional costs
associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of
any conflicting minerals used in our products. Also, since our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational
challenges if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all metals used in our products through the due
diligence procedures that we implement. Moreover, we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who
require that all of the components of our products are certified as conflict free.
Other regulatory requirements potentially affecting our back-end manufacturing processes and the design
and marketing of our products are in development throughout the world. In addition, a number of jurisdictions
including the EU, Australia and China are developing or finalizing market entry requirements or public
procurement for computers and servers based on ENERGY STAR specification as well as additional energy
consumption limits. Some of these regulations are expected to be approved and implemented by the end of 2012.
If such requirements are implemented in the proposed time frame and do not contain recommended
modifications as proposed by industry associations, there is the potential for certain of our microprocessor,
chipset and GPU products, as incorporated in desktop and mobile PCs, workstations, servers and other
information and communications technology products being excluded from these markets which could materially
adversely affect us. While we have budgeted for foreseeable associated expenditures, we cannot assure you that
future environmental legal requirements will not become more stringent or costly in the future. Therefore, we
cannot assure you that our costs of complying with current and future environmental and health and safety laws,
and our liabilities arising from past and future releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances will not have a
material adverse effect on us.
16