TiVo 2007 Annual Report Download - page 36

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 36 of the 2007 TiVo annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 136

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136

Table of Contents
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters, which houses our administrative, sales and marketing, customer service and product development activities, is located in
Alviso, California, under a lease that expires on January 31, 2010, and is comprised of two buildings totaling 127,124 square feet of office space. We believe
that we may need to expand our corporate facilities to meet our office space needs in the next several years as we currently utilize approximately 95% of our
total office space. Our current facilities lease obligations are subject to periodic increases and we believe that our existing facilities are well maintained and in
good operating condition. The Company also has operating leases for sales and administrative office space in New York City, New York and Chicago,
Illinois.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Intellectual Property Litigation. On January 5, 2004, TiVo filed a complaint against EchoStar Communications Corporation in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas alleging willful and deliberate infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,233,389, entitled "Multimedia Time Warping System." On
January 15, 2004, the Company amended its complaint to add EchoStar DBS Corporation, EchoStar Technologies Corporation, and Echosphere Limited
Liability Corporation as additional defendants. The Company alleges that it is the owner of this patent, and further alleges that the defendants have willfully
and deliberately infringed this patent by making, selling, offering to sell and/or selling digital video recording devices, digital video recording device software,
and/or personal television services in the United States. On April 13, 2006, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Company in the amount of
approximately $74.0 million dollars. The jury ruled that the Company's patent is valid and that all nine of the asserted claims in the Company's patent are
infringed by each of the accused EchoStar products. The jury also ruled that the defendants' willfully infringed the patent. On May 16, 2006, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued its first Office Action in response to a request by the defendants for reexamination of the 389 patent. The
USPTO reexamined all 61 claims set forth in the 389 patent, confirming the validity of the majority of the claims, including two of the claims that the
defendants have been found to have willfully infringed, and rejecting some of the claims. On November 28, 2007, the USPTO issued a Notice of Intent to
Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate in its reexamination of the Company's U.S. Patent No. 6,233,389, entitled "Multimedia Time Warping System,"
closing the reexamination and confirming the patentability of all of the patent's claims. On August 17, 2006, the district court denied TiVo's request for
enhanced damages and attorney's fees and costs and granted TiVo's motion for a permanent injunction. The district court denied EchoStar's request to stay the
injunction pending appeal On September 8, 2006 the district court issued an Amended Final and Permanent injunction that prohibited EchoStar
Communications Corporation from making, using, offering for sale or selling in the United States the following EchoStar DVRs: DP-501, DP-508, DP-510,
DP-721, DP-921, DP-522, DP-625, DP-942, and all EchoStar Communications Corporation DVRs that are not more than colorably different from any of
these products. The district court also ordered EchoStar Communications Corporation to pay TiVo approximately $74.0 million in damages as awarded by the
jury, prejudgment interest at the prime rate through July 31, 2006 of approximately $5.4 million, and supplemental damages for infringement through July 31,
2006 in the amount of approximately $10.3 million. On October 3, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit stayed the district court's
injunction pending appeal. On November 27, 2006, the district court denied all of EchoStar's post-judgment motions. On January 23, 2007, the district court
awarded the Company prejudgment interest and supplemental damages for the period of August 1, 2006 through September 8, 2006 in the amounts of
approximately $790,000 and $3.5 million, respectively. On January 31, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C.
unanimously ruled in favor of TiVo Inc. in connection with EchoStar's appeal of the district court judgment of patent infringement against EchoStar with
respect to several claims (so called software claims) of the patent, upholding the full award of damages from the district court, and ordering that the stay of the
district court's injunction against EchoStar's infringing digital video recorders that was issued pending appeal will dissolve when the appeal becomes final.
The district court's judgment of infringement by EchoStar of certain other claims of the patent (so called hardware claims) were reversed and remanded for
further proceedings. On April 11, 2008, the Federal Circuit denied EchoStar's combined petition for a panel rehearing and en banc rehearing of the Federal
Circuit's denial of their appeal of the district court's judgment. EchoStar has stated it intends to appeal the Federal Circuit's ruling to the Supreme Court. As of
April 15, 2008, EchoStar has placed approximately $103.8 million in escrow during their appeal of the Company's trial court victory. Pursuant to the terms of
the escrow agreement between EchoStar and the Company, the Company shall receive payment of these escrowed funds if a writ of certiorari is not filed or is
denied or if certiorari is granted but then the judgment in favor of the Company is affirmed in whole or in part by the Supreme Court. The escrow funds
encompass damages through September 8, 2006 and related interest through August 16, 2008 only, and do not reflect damages since that date. The Company
is incurring material expenses in this litigation. The Company has not recorded any gain from this patent victory as it is still on appeal.
34