Express Scripts 2014 Annual Report Download - page 18

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 18 of the 2014 Express Scripts annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 116

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116

Express Scripts 2014 Annual Report
16
ofAppealsfortheFirstCircuitpreviouslyheldthelawnotpreemptedbyERISA.IntheDistrictofColumbiacase,thecourt
grantedinpartPCMA’smotionforsummaryjudgmentfindingtheDistrictofColumbialawwaspreemptedbyERISAandthat
decisionwasaffirmedbytheUnitedStatesCourtofAppealsfortheD.C.Circuit.Widespreadenactmentofsuchstatutes(ifnot
preemptedbyERISA)couldhaveamaterialadverseeffectuponourfinancialcondition,resultsofoperationsandcashflows.
Consumer Protection Laws.Moststateshaveconsumerprotectionlawsthathavebeenthebasisforinvestigations
andmulti-statesettlementsrelatingtofinancialincentivesprovidedbydrugmanufacturerstoretailpharmaciesinconnection
withdrugswitchingprograms.SuchstatuteshavealsobeencitedasthebasisforclaimsagainstPBMseitherincivillitigation
orpursuanttoinvestigationsbystateAttorneysGeneral.
Network Access Legislation.Amajorityofstatesnowhavesomeformoflegislationaffectingourability,orour
clients’ability,tolimitaccesstoapharmacyprovidernetworkorremoveaproviderfromthenetwork.Suchlegislationmay
requireusorourclientstoadmitanyretailpharmacywillingtomeettheplan’spriceandothertermsfornetworkparticipation
(“anywillingprovider”legislation)ormayprovidethataprovidermaynotberemovedfromanetworkexceptincompliance
withcertainprocedures(“dueprocess”legislation).Wehavenotbeenmateriallyaffectedbythesestatutes.
CertainstateshaveenactedlegislationprohibitingcertainPBMclientsfromimposingadditionalco-payments,
deductibles,limitationonbenefits,orotherconditions(“Conditions”)oncoveredindividualsutilizingaretailpharmacywhen
thesameConditionsarenototherwiseimposedoncoveredindividualsutilizinghomedeliverypharmacies.However,the
legislationrequirestheretailpharmacyagreetothesamereimbursementamountsandtermsandconditionsasareimposedon
thehomedeliverypharmacies.Anincreaseinthenumberofprescriptionsfilledatretailpharmaciesmayhaveanegative
impactontheamountofprescriptionsfilledthroughhomedelivery.Itisanticipatedadditionalstateswillconsidersimilar
legislationandwecannotpredictwhichstateswilladoptsuchlegislationorwhateffectitwillhave,ifany.
Legislation Affecting Plan Design.Somestateshaveenactedlegislationthatprohibitsmanagedcareplansponsors
fromimplementingcertainrestrictivebenefitplandesignfeatures,andmanystateshaveintroducedlegislationtoregulate
variousaspectsofmanagedcareplans,includingprovisionsrelatingtothepharmacybenefit.Forexample,somestates,under
so-called“freedomofchoice”legislation,providemembersoftheplanmaynotberequiredtousenetworkproviders,butmust
insteadbeprovidedwithbenefitseveniftheychoosetousenon-networkproviders.Otherstateshaveenactedlegislation
purportingtoprohibithealthplansfromofferingmembersfinancialincentivesforuseofhomedeliverypharmacies.Medicare
andsomestateshaveissuedguidanceandregulationswhichlimitourabilitytofillorrefillprescriptionselectronically
submittedbyaphysiciantoourhomedeliverypharmacywithoutfirstobtainingconsentfromthepatient.Suchrestrictions
generateadditionalcostsandlimitourabilitytomaximizeefficiencieswhichcouldotherwisebegainedthroughtheelectronic
prescriptionandautomaticrefillprocesses.Legislationhasbeenintroducedinsomestatestoprohibitorrestricttherapeutic
intervention,ortorequirecoverageofallFDAapproveddrugs.Otherstatesmandatecoverageofcertainbenefitsorconditions,
andrequirehealthplancoverageofspecificdrugsifdeemedmedicallynecessarybytheprescribingphysician.Statesarealso
standardizingtheprocessfor,andrestrictingtheuseof,utilizationmanagementrulesandshorteningthetimeframeswithin
whichprescriptiondrugpriorauthorizationdeterminationsmustbemade.Suchlegislationdoesnotgenerallyapplytous
directly,butmayapplytocertainofourclients,suchasmanagedcareorganizationsandhealthinsurers.Ifsuchlegislation
weretobecomewidelyadoptedandbroadinscope,itcouldhavetheeffectoflimitingtheeconomicbenefitsachievable
throughpharmacybenefitmanagement.
Legislation and Regulation Affecting Drug Prices.Somestateshaveadoptedso-called“mostfavorednation”
legislationprovidingapharmacyparticipatinginthestateMedicaidprogrammustgivethestatethebestpricethepharmacy
makesavailabletoanythird-partyplan.Suchlegislationmayadverselyaffectourabilitytonegotiatediscountsinthefuture
fromnetworkpharmacies.
Inthepasttwoyears,stateshavealsostartedtoenactstatutesregulatingtheuseofMaximumAllowableCost
(“MAC”)pricing.Thesestatutes,referredtoas“MACTransparencyLaws,”generallyrequirePBMstodisclosespecific
informationrelatedtoMACpricingtopharmaciesandprovidecertainappealrightsforpharmacies.MACTransparencyLaws
alsorestricttheapplicationofMACandmayrequireoperationalchangestomaintaincompliancewiththelaw.Theselaws
havethepotentialtonegativelyimpactExpressScriptsinanumberofways,including,butnotlimitedto,increasing
administrativeburdenanddecreasingflexibilityinsettingandmanagingMACpricing.AsmorestatesadoptMAC
TransparencyLaws,theimpactoftheselawsmaycontinuetogrow.
ThefederalMedicaidrebateprogramrequiresparticipatingdrugmanufacturerstoproviderebatesonalldrugs
reimbursedthroughstateMedicaidprograms,includingthroughMedicaidmanagedcareorganizations.Manufacturersofbrand
nameproductsmustprovidearebateequivalenttothegreaterof(a)23.1%oftheaveragemanufacturerprice(“AMP”)paidby
retailcommunitypharmaciesorbywholesalersforcertaininnovatordrugsdistributedtoretailcommunitypharmacies,or
(b)thedifferencebetweenAMPandthe“bestprice”availabletoessentiallyanycustomerotherthantheMedicaidprogramand
12