Cardinal Health 2011 Annual Report Download - page 49

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 49 of the 2011 Cardinal Health annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 122

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122

Cost o
f
Pro
d
ucts So
ld
Consistent with the increases in revenue, our cost of
p
roducts sold increased $3.8 billion, or 4
p
ercent,
d
uring fiscal 2011 and increased by
$
2.5 billion, or 3 percent, during fiscal 2010
.
Gross Margin
Change
G
ross Margin
(
in millions, except
g
rowth rates
)
2
011
2
010 201
1
201
0
2009
Gross mar
gi
n
.
.........................................
10% 1%
$4
,
162.0 $3
,
780.7 $3
,
747.
5
F
iscal 2011 Com
p
ared to Fiscal 201
0
P
harmaceutical se
g
men
t
Gross mar
g
in increased $446 million in fiscal 2011 primaril
y
as a result of the factors listed below.
• Stron
g
performance in our
g
eneric pharmaceutical pro
g
rams, includin
g
the impact of new produc
t
launches, increased gross margin by
$
239 million.
Acquisitions, net of divestitures, positively impacted gross margin by
$
198 million
.
Increased mar
g
in from branded pharmaceutical sales (exclusive of the related volume impact) had
a
p
ositive impact on gross margin of
$
72 million. The increase was primarily due to our performanc
e
under distribution service a
g
reements and the transition of certain vendors to distribution service
a
g
reements. Factors that can influence mar
g
in from branded pharmaceutical sales include our service-
l
eve
l
per
f
ormance un
d
er
di
str
ib
ut
i
on serv
i
ce agreements; our
i
nventory
l
eve
l
an
d
m
i
x; an
d
t
he
m
a
g
nitude and timin
g
of pharmaceutical price appreciation
.
Customer pr
i
c
i
ng c
h
anges
i
nc
l
u
di
ng re
b
ates (exc
l
us
i
ve o
f
t
h
ere
l
ate
d
vo
l
ume
i
mpact) a
d
verse
ly
i
mpacted
g
ross mar
g
in b
y
$99 million. The adverse impact of these customer pricin
g
chan
g
es i
s
p
art
i
a
ll
yo
ff
set
b
y pro
d
uct m
i
x, sourc
i
ng programs an
d
ot
h
er sources o
f
marg
i
n
.
M
edical segment
Gross mar
g
in decreased $59 million in fiscal 2011 primaril
y
as a result of the factors listed below
.
• Increase
d
cost o
f
o
il
-
b
ase
d
res
i
ns
,
cotton
,l
atex
,di
ese
lf
ue
l
an
d
ot
h
er commo
di
t
i
es use
di
n our se
lf
-
m
anufactured and private brand products decreased
g
ross mar
g
in b
y
$59 million
.
Increased net sales volume resulted in a $22 million favorable impact to
g
ross mar
g
in
.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we realized a one-time
g
ain of $14 million as a result of th
e
r
eco
g
nition of previousl
y
deferred intercompan
y
revenue for sales to CareFusion.
Somewhat slu
gg
ish healthcare utilization disproportionatel
y
affected sur
g
ical procedures and
c
onsequent
l
y our
hi
g
h
er-marg
i
n pro
d
ucts.
F
iscal 2010 Compared to Fiscal 200
9
P
harmaceutical segmen
t
Gross mar
g
in decreased
$
65 million in fiscal 2010 as a result of the factors listed below.
•Pr
i
c
i
ng c
h
anges on renewe
d
customer contracts (exc
l
us
i
ve o
f
t
h
ere
l
ate
d
vo
l
ume
i
mpact)
d
ecrease
d
g
ross mar
g
in b
y
$103 million
.
In fiscal 2009, Medicine Sho
pp
e offered an alternative franchise model to its franchisees to
p
osition the
franchise s
y
stem for future
g
rowth. This transformation adversel
y
impacted
g
ross mar
g
in b
y
$6
5
milli
on
i
n
fi
sca
l
2010;
h
owever, t
hi
s was part
i
a
ll
yo
ff
set
b
ye
ffi
c
i
enc
i
es ga
i
ne
d
w
i
t
hi
n SG&A
.
23