Allegheny Power 2014 Annual Report Download - page 129

114
On March 20, 2013, the NJBPU ordered that a generic proceeding be established to investigate the prudence of costs incurred by
all New Jersey utilities for service restoration efforts associated with the major storm events of 2011 and 2012. The Order provided
that if any utility had already filed a proceeding for recovery of such storm costs, to the extent the amount of approved recovery
had not yet been determined, the prudence of such costs would be reviewed in the generic proceeding. On May 31, 2013, the
NJBPU clarified its earlier order to indicate that the 2011 major storm costs would be reviewed expeditiously in the generic proceeding,
with the goal of maintaining the base rate case schedule established by the ALJ where recovery of such costs would be addressed.
The NJBPU further indicated that it would review the 2012 major storm costs in the generic proceeding and the recovery of such
costs would be considered through a Phase II in the existing base rate case or through another appropriate method to be determined
at the conclusion of the generic proceeding. On June 21, 2013, JCP&L filed a detailed report in support of recovery of major storm
costs with the NJBPU. On February 24, 2014, a Stipulation was filed with the NJBPU by JCP&L, the Division of Rate Counsel and
NJBPU Staff which will allow recovery of $736 million of JCP&L’s $744 million of costs related to the significant weather events of
2011 and 2012. As a result, FirstEnergy recorded a regulatory asset impairment charge of approximately $8 million (pre-tax) as of
December 31, 2013. By its Order of March 19, 2014, the NJBPU approved the Stipulation of Settlement. Although the settlement
permits recovery of 2011 and 2012 storm costs, the recovery of the 2011 costs will be addressed in the pending base rate case;
whereas the manner and timing of recovery of the 2012 storm costs totaling $580 million will be determined by the NJBPU.
OHIO
The Ohio Companies primarily operate under their ESP 3 plan which expires on May 31, 2016. The material terms of ESP 3 include:
• Continuing the current base distribution rate freeze through May 31, 2016;
• Continues collection of lost distribution revenues associated with energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs;
• Continuing to provide economic development and assistance to low-income customers for the two-year plan period at
levels established in the prior ESP;
• A 6% generation rate discount to certain low income customers provided by the Ohio Companies through a bilateral
wholesale contract with FES (FES is one of the wholesale suppliers to the Ohio Companies);
• Continuing to provide power to non-shopping customers at a market-based price set through an auction process;
• Continuing Rider DCR that allows continued investment in the distribution system for the benefit of customers;
• Continuing commitment not to recover from retail customers certain costs related to transmission cost allocations for the
longer of the five-year period from June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2016 or when the amount of costs avoided by customers
for certain types of products totals $360 million, subject to the outcome of certain FERC proceedings;
• Securing generation supply for a longer period of time by conducting an auction for a three-year period rather than a one-
year period, in each of October 2012 and January 2013, to mitigate any potential price spikes for the Ohio Companies'
utility customers who do not switch to a competitive generation supplier; and
• Extending the recovery period for costs associated with purchasing RECs mandated by SB221, Ohio's renewable energy
and energy efficiency standard, through the end of the new ESP 3 period. This is expected to initially reduce the monthly
renewable energy charge for all non-shopping utility customers of the Ohio Companies by spreading out the costs over
the entire ESP period.
Notices of appeal of the Ohio Companies' ESP 3 plan to the Supreme Court of Ohio were filed by the Northeast Ohio Public Energy
Council and the ELPC. The matter has not yet been scheduled for oral argument.
The Ohio Companies filed an application with the PUCO on August 4, 2014 seeking approval of their ESP IV entitled Powering
Ohio's Progress. The Ohio Companies have requested a decision by the PUCO by April 8, 2015. The Ohio Companies filed a partial
Stipulation and Recommendation on December 22, 2014. The evidentiary hearing on the ESP IV is scheduled to commence on
April 13, 2015. The material terms of the proposed plan include:
• Continuing a base distribution rate freeze through May 31, 2019;
• Continuing collection of lost distribution revenues associated with energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs;
• Providing economic development and assistance to low-income customers for the three-year plan period;
• An Economic Stability Program providing for a retail rate stability rider to flow through charges or credits representing the
net result of the costs paid to FES through a proposed 15-year purchase power agreement for the output of Sammis,
Davis-Besse and FES’ share of OVEC against the revenues received from selling the output into the PJM markets over
the same period;
• Continuing to provide power to non-shopping customers at a market-based price set through an auction process;
• Continuing Rider DCR with increased revenue caps of approximately $30 million per year that allows continued investment
supporting the distribution system for the benefit of customers;
• A commitment not to recover from retail customers certain costs related to transmission cost allocations for the longer of
the five-year period from June 1, 2011 through May 31, 2016 or when the amount of such costs avoided by customers for
certain types of products totals $360 million, including appropriately such costs from MISO along with such costs from
PJM, subject to the outcome of certain FERC proceedings; and
• General updates to electric service regulations and tariffs to reflect regulatory orders, administrative rule changes, and
current practices.
Under Ohio's energy efficiency standards (SB221 and SB310), and the Ohio Companies' filing of amended energy efficiency plans,
the Ohio Companies are required to implement energy efficiency programs that achieve a total annual energy savings equivalent
of approximately 2,237 GWHs in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The Ohio Companies are also required to reduce peak demand in 2009