Mercury Insurance 2009 Annual Report Download - page 38

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 38 of the 2009 Mercury Insurance annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 132

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132

The failure of any of the loss limitation methods employed by the Company could have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Various provisions of the Company’s policies, such as limitations or exclusions from coverage which are
intended to limit the Company’s risks, may not be enforceable in the manner the Company intends. In addition,
the Company’s policies contain conditions requiring the prompt reporting of claims and the Company’s right to
decline coverage in the event of a violation of that condition. While the Company’s insurance product exclusions
and limitations reduce the Company’s loss exposure and help eliminate known exposures to certain risks, it is
possible that a court or regulatory authority could nullify or void an exclusion or legislation could be enacted
modifying or barring the use of such endorsements and limitations in a way that would adversely affect the
Company’s loss experience, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of
operations.
The Company’s business is vulnerable to significant catastrophic property loss, which could have an
adverse effect on its results of operations.
The Company faces a significant risk of loss in the ordinary course of its business for property damage
resulting from natural disasters, man-made catastrophes and other catastrophic events, particularly hurricanes,
earthquakes, hail storms, explosions, tropical storms, fires, sinkholes, war, acts of terrorism, severe winter
weather and other natural and man-made disasters. Such events typically increase the frequency and severity of
automobile and other property claims. Because catastrophic loss events are by their nature unpredictable,
historical results of operations may not be indicative of future results of operations, and the occurrence of claims
from catastrophic events is likely to result in substantial volatility in the Company’s financial condition and
results of operations from period to period. Although the Company attempts to manage its exposure to such
events, the occurrence of one or more major catastrophes in any given period could have a material and adverse
impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and could result in substantial outflows of
cash as losses are paid.
The Company depends on independent agents and brokers who may discontinue sales of its policies at
any time.
The Company sells its insurance policies through approximately 5,100 independent agents and brokers. The
Company must compete with other insurance carriers for these agents’ and brokers’ business. Some competitors
offer a larger variety of products, lower prices for insurance coverage, higher commissions, or more attractive
non-cash incentives. To maintain its relationship with these independent agents, the Company must pay
competitive commissions, be able to respond to their needs quickly and adequately, and create a consistently high
level of customer satisfaction. If these independent agents find it preferable to do business with the Company’s
competitors, it would be difficult to renew the Company’s existing business or attract new business. State
regulations may also limit the manner in which the Company’s producers are compensated or incentivized. Such
developments could negatively impact the Company’s relationship with these parties and ultimately reduce
revenues.
The Company’s expansion plans may adversely affect its future profitability.
The Company is currently expanding and intends to further expand its operations in several of the states in
which the Company has operations and into states in which it has not yet begun operations. The intended
expansion will necessitate increased expenditures. The Company expects to fund these expenditures out of cash
flow from operations. The expansion may not occur, or if it does occur may not be successful in providing
increased revenues or profitability. If the Company’s cash flow from operations is insufficient to cover the
increased costs of the expansion, or if the expansion does not provide the benefits anticipated, the Company’s
financial condition, results of operations, and ability to grow its business may be harmed.
20