Western Digital 2006 Annual Report Download - page 34

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 34 of the 2006 Western Digital annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 116

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116

•Lasker v. Massengill, et al., Case No. 06-CC-00159, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
Orange, filed August 14, 2006. The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, accounting,
abuse of control, gross mismanagement, constructive fraud, corporate waste, unjust enrichment, and rescission in
connection with our option granting practices.
•Rosen v. Shakeel, et al., Case No. 06CC00234, Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Orange,
filed November 6, 2006. The complaint asserts causes of action for unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty,
violations of the California Corporations Code, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets,
accounting, rescission, and constructive trust in connection with our option granting practices.
We have joined the other defendants in filing a motion to dismiss the Dreyfuss and Kastella and Sakamoto actions.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006.
28