HCA Holdings 2011 Annual Report Download - page 51

Download and view the complete annual report

Please find page 51 of the 2011 HCA Holdings annual report below. You can navigate through the pages in the report by either clicking on the pages listed below, or by using the keyword search tool below to find specific information within the annual report.

Page out of 159

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159

submit false claims for payments to, or improperly retain overpayments from, the government. Some states have
adopted similar state whistleblower and false claims provisions. Certain of our individual facilities have received,
and other facilities may receive, government inquiries from, and may be subject to investigation by, federal and
state agencies. Depending on whether the underlying conduct in these or future inquiries or investigations could
be considered systemic, their resolution could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations and liquidity.
Governmental agencies and their agents, such as the Medicare Administrative Contractors, fiscal
intermediaries and carriers, as well as the OIG, CMS and state Medicaid programs, conduct audits of our health
care operations. Private payers may conduct similar post-payment audits, and we also perform internal audits and
monitoring. Depending on the nature of the conduct found in such audits and whether the underlying conduct
could be considered systemic, the resolution of these audits could have a material, adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations and liquidity.
As required by statute, CMS has implemented the RAC program on a nationwide basis. Under the program,
CMS contracts with RACs on a contingency fee basis to conduct post-payment reviews to detect and correct
improper payments in the fee-for-service Medicare program. The Health Reform Law expands the RAC
program’s scope to include managed Medicare plans and to include Medicaid claims. In addition, CMS employs
MICs to perform post-payment audits of Medicaid claims and identify overpayments. The Health Reform Law
increases federal funding for the MIC program. In addition to RACs and MICs, the state Medicaid agencies and
other contractors have increased their review activities.
Should we be found out of compliance with any of these laws, regulations or programs, depending on the
nature of the findings, our business, our financial position and our results of operations could be negatively
impacted.
Physician utilization practices and treatment methodologies or governmental or managed care controls
designed to reduce inpatient services or surgical procedures may reduce our revenues.
Controls imposed by Medicare, managed Medicare, Medicaid, managed Medicaid and commercial third-
party payers designed to reduce admissions, intensity of services, surgical volumes and lengths of stay, in some
instances referred to as “utilization review,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect our facilities.
Utilization review entails the review of the admission and course of treatment of a patient by health plans.
Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payer-
required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by payer pressure to maximize outpatient and
alternative health care delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Efforts to impose more stringent cost controls
are expected to continue. For example, the Health Reform Law potentially expands the use of prepayment review
by Medicare contractors by eliminating statutory restrictions on their use. Although we are unable to predict the
effect these changes will have on our operations, significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on
reimbursement rates and fees could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial position and results
of operations. Additionally, trends in physician treatment protocols and managed care health plan design, such as
plans that shift increased costs and accountability for care to patients, could reduce our surgical volumes and
admissions in favor of lower intensity and lower cost treatment methodologies.
Our overall business results may suffer from the economic downturn.
During periods of high unemployment, governmental entities often experience budget deficits as a result of
increased costs and lower than expected tax collections. These budget deficits at federal, state and local
government entities have decreased, and may continue to decrease, spending for health and human service
programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and similar programs, which represent significant payer sources for our
hospitals. Other risks we face during periods of high unemployment include potential declines in the population
covered under managed care agreements, patient decisions to postpone or cancel elective and non-emergency
health care procedures (including delaying surgical procedures), potential increases in the uninsured and
underinsured populations and further difficulties in our collecting patient copayment and deductible receivables.
48